On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 7:53 PM Eduard-Mihai Burtescu <ed...@lyken.rs> wrote:
> I agree that landing the extra changes later on top should be fine anyway,
> though when I make the sprintf -> snprintf change, I could provide the extra
> changes as well (either as a combined patch, or as a second tiny patch).
>
> Sadly I don't think I can get to either until next week, hope that's okay.

I can make the sprintf -> snprintf change as early as tomorrow.

I suspect I can also make the substantive const generics change, based
on the Rust implementation, though that's less of a promise.

> All that data is around 1GB but maybe I should try to upload it somewhere
> public so that anyone can repeat this procedure, or I could even redo the
> collection process (in order to gather even more / newer symbol names).

Sharing that file would be very appreciated. I imagine sharing it
publicly would be best, but if finding hosting is difficult, you could
upload directly to my Dropbox:
https://www.dropbox.com/request/PdJDiYQHs9poezwIHFV9

Nikhil

Reply via email to