Hi David, all, On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 10:12:31AM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote: > > I'm sorry you see this as a matter of respect. I didn't see it that > > way at all. Segher disagreed with your review, and gave sufficient > > technical reason for me to commit the patch.
> If you or Segher disagree with my review, we can discuss it like > mature adults and reach a mutually-acceptable outcome. I'm a > reasonable person. Like I said, I do *not* disagree with what you said. I just thought you missed the point of the patch, which was to fix another (much more trivial) problem, not the bigger problem that you want to see fixed (and I agree with that, as I said). But we cannot ask contributors to solve unrelated problems. We can try to interest them in solving things, but not much more. I thought it would be obvious to you as well that Alan's patch just was for the one simple problem (like some related patches I acked at about the same time), which is why I didn't talk to you first. I wasn't overriding your review, your points are well taken. Take care, Segher
