Hi, Gentle ping for the patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-September/553555.html
BR, Kewen on 2020/10/13 下午2:59, Kewen.Lin via Gcc-patches wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to gentle ping this patch: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-September/553555.html > > BR, > Kewen > > on 2020/9/10 上午11:19, Kewen.Lin via Gcc-patches wrote: >> Hi, >> >> As Segher's suggestion in the PR, for 128bit_direct_move, this new >> version leverages vector pack insns instead of vector perms with >> one control vector. The performance evaluation shows that it's on >> par with the previous version for char, while it's better than the >> previous for short. >> >> Bootstrapped/regtested again on powerpc64{,le}-linux-gnu P8 and >> powerpc64le-linux-gnu P9. >> >> Is it ok for trunk? >> >> BR, >> Kewen >> ------------ >> >> gcc/ChangeLog: >> >> PR target/96933 >> * config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_expand_vector_init): Use direct move >> instructions for vector construction with char/short types. >> * config/rs6000/rs6000.md (p8_mtvsrwz_v16qisi2): New define_insn. >> (p8_mtvsrd_v16qidi2): Likewise. >> >> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: >> >> PR target/96933 >> * gcc.target/powerpc/pr96933-1.c: New test. >> * gcc.target/powerpc/pr96933-2.c: New test. >> * gcc.target/powerpc/pr96933-3.c: New test. >> * gcc.target/powerpc/pr96933.h: New test. >>
