These 3 patches are the slight reworking of two separate patches for the library tests.
The first patch that has been replaced is: Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2020 12:17:47 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] PowerPC Fix ibm128 defaults for pr70117.c test. Message-ID: <20201115171747.ga10...@ibm-toto.the-meissners.org> The second patch that has been replaced is: Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2020 12:23:50 -050 Subject: [PATCH] PowerPC: Restrict long double test to use IBM long double. Message-ID: <20201115172350.ga10...@ibm-toto.the-meissners.org> These 3 patches are: 1) Patch to target-supports.exp that adds 3 new targets to explicitly test for the PowerPC long double type. In the previous patches, I only added the patch that I needed (long double == IBM 128-bit). This time, I'm adding all 3 varieties of long double. I also insured that the target-supports only runs on PowerPC. 2) Patch to gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr70117.c to restrict it to IBM 128-bit long double. I removed the #ifdefs in the test that tried to use __ibm128. The previous patch tried to use a #define for the IEEE 128-bit maximum value. 3) Patch to gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/dfp/convert-bfp-11.c to only run the test if long double is IBM 128-bit. I moved the target supports code to the first patch in this series. I also changed the requirement from powerpc-linux to dfp. I have run these tests with compilers using IEEE 128-bit long double, IBM 128-bit long double, and 64-bit long double. I verified that the tests are skipped as UNSUPPORTED if long double is not IBM 128-bit, and they pass on IBM 128-bit long double. Can I check these patches into the master branch? Ideally, I would like to back port these patches to earlier GCC branches. -- Michael Meissner, IBM IBM, M/S 2506R, 550 King Street, Littleton, MA 01460-6245, USA email: meiss...@linux.ibm.com, phone: +1 (978) 899-4797
