> On Nov 25, 2020, at 5:05 PM, Hans-Peter Nilsson <h...@bitrange.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 24 Nov 2020, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>
>>> I'm intested in any notes, however vague, on that matter. I was
>>> a bit surprised to see that myself...that is, after fixing
>>> *some* related regressions, like the one in combine. (Did I
>>> actually miss something?)
>>
>> My recollection for the Visium port would align with what Jeff saw but, on
>> the
>> other hand, this could have been very marginal a phenomenon in the end.
>
> Thanks. Though, without claims substantiated as anything more
> than a feeling, I'm going stick out my chin and say that you're
> both seasoned enough gcc hackers to be influenced by earlier
> experience, and that things have changed enough that this is no
> longer true.
FWIW, I used the Visium approach (and a pile of help from Eric), i.e., CC after
reload, in the PDP-11 cc0 conversion.
paul
