On 11/23/20 1:40 PM, JeanHeyd Meneide wrote:
> Dear Jeff,
>
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 3:02 PM Jeff Law <l...@redhat.com> wrote:
>> You use a getter function to retrieve the value of ret.to, which is
>> fine. Is there a specific reason why you're not using a setter function
>> to save the value?
> I did this because I have access to ret.to in the libcpp
> functions! Outside, the structure of that type is unknown and only a
> pointer, so it needs the getter function.
Thanks. I've fixed up the ChangeLog entry and pushed the patch to the
trunk.
Jeff
