On Thu, 3 Dec 2020, Jeff Law wrote: > > Note that I have included unrelated though contextually connected 6/6 as > > an RFC to verify whether this potential anomaly I have spotted has been > > intentional. I'll be happy to drop it if that is the case. The remaining > > changes are I believe actual bug fixes. > I doubt it's intentional. I'd tend to think this specific patch in the > series should wait until gcc-12 out of an abundance of caution.
Makes sense to me. Since we have a working instance of patchwork and I actively use it for patch management (for own patches anyway, as I can't update the status of other people's patches) all I need to do is to just get back to it once we reopen for GCC 12 and see what's been outstanding there. Thanks for your review. Maciej
