On Fri, 18 Dec 2020 at 20:31, Segher Boessenkool <seg...@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 06:13:22PM +0100, Georg-Johann Lay wrote: > > Segher Boessenkool schrieb: > > >On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 10:07:22AM -0500, Paul Koning wrote: > > >>>On Dec 17, 2020, at 6:21 AM, Segher Boessenkool > > >>><seg...@kernel.crashing.org> wrote: > > >>>On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 02:15:51PM +0530, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj via > > >>>Gcc-patches wrote: > > >>>>The work on my github branch was not complete - I'd blindly followed > > >>>>whatever the CC0 Transition wiki mentioned (the first three steps of > > >>>>case #2), and fixed any regression fallout (for ATmega128). > [...] @Senthil Kumar Selvaraj <saaa...@gcc.gnu.org> Remember that a full polish of the avr-backend is beyond the scope of the task/bounty: avr-cc0 ---[eliminate cc0]---> avr-non-cc0 with similar (or even worse) quality. Possibly this one is relevant as for "effort": https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2020-April/000455.html as mentioned here: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92729#c9 <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2020-April/000455.html>
