The implicit -mlong-calls from our vxworks configurations makes the
tail-call instructions differ from those expected by the
no_unique_address tests in gcc.target/arm.

This patch adds -mno-long-calls to the compilation commands, so that
we generate the expected sequences.

Regstrapped on x86_64-linux-gnu, also tested on arm-vxworks7r2.
Ok to install?


for  gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog

        * gcc.target/arm/no_unique_address_1.C: Add -mno-long-calls.
        * gcc.target/arm/no_unique_address_2.C: Likewise.
---
 gcc/testsuite/g++.target/arm/no_unique_address_1.C |    2 +-
 gcc/testsuite/g++.target/arm/no_unique_address_2.C |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.target/arm/no_unique_address_1.C 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.target/arm/no_unique_address_1.C
index 038aa00a499e9..40fc68b374521 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.target/arm/no_unique_address_1.C
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.target/arm/no_unique_address_1.C
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 /* { dg-require-effective-target arm_arch_v8a_hard_ok } */
-/* { dg-options "-std=c++11 -O -foptimize-sibling-calls" } */
+/* { dg-options "-std=c++11 -O -foptimize-sibling-calls -mno-long-calls" } */
 /* { dg-add-options arm_arch_v8a_hard } */
 /* { dg-final { check-function-bodies "**" "" "" } } */
 
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.target/arm/no_unique_address_2.C 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.target/arm/no_unique_address_2.C
index 8be5de2539a38..b66b4d004965b 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.target/arm/no_unique_address_2.C
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.target/arm/no_unique_address_2.C
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 /* { dg-require-effective-target arm_arch_v8a_hard_ok } */
-/* { dg-options "-std=c++17 -O -foptimize-sibling-calls" } */
+/* { dg-options "-std=c++17 -O -foptimize-sibling-calls -mno-long-calls" } */
 /* { dg-add-options arm_arch_v8a_hard } */
 /* { dg-final { check-function-bodies "**" "" "" } } */
 

-- 
Alexandre Oliva, happy hacker  https://FSFLA.org/blogs/lxo/
   Free Software Activist         GNU Toolchain Engineer
        Vim, Vi, Voltei pro Emacs -- GNUlius Caesar

Reply via email to