On 1/7/21 11:47 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
In GCC10 cp_walk_subtrees has been changed to walk template arguments. As the following testcase, that changed the mangling of some functions.
Argh.
I believe the previous behavior that find_abi_tags_r doesn't recurse into template args has been the correct one, but setting *walk_subtrees = 0 for the types and handling the types subtree walking manually in find_abi_tags_r looks too hard, there are a lot of subtrees and details what should and shouldn't be walked, both in tree.c (walk_type_fields there, which is static) and in cp_walk_subtrees itself. The following patch abuses the fact that *walk_subtrees is an int to tell cp_walk_subtrees it shouldn't walk the template args. Another option would be to have two separate cp_walk_subtrees-like callbacks, one that wouldn't walk into template args and the other that would and then would tail call the other one, and cp_walk_tree_without_duplicates but call walk_tree_1 directly or use some other macro.
I like the idea to use *walk_subtrees to distinguish between walking syntactic subtrees and walking type-identity subtrees. But it should be more general; how does this look to you?
Jason
diff --git a/gcc/cp/class.c b/gcc/cp/class.c index c41ac7deefe..00c0dba0a55 100644 --- a/gcc/cp/class.c +++ b/gcc/cp/class.c @@ -1507,6 +1507,10 @@ mark_or_check_tags (tree t, tree *tp, abi_tag_data *p, bool val) static tree find_abi_tags_r (tree *tp, int *walk_subtrees, void *data) { + if (TYPE_P (*tp) && *walk_subtrees == 1) + /* Tell cp_walk_subtrees to look though typedefs. */ + *walk_subtrees = 2; + if (!OVERLOAD_TYPE_P (*tp)) return NULL_TREE; @@ -1527,6 +1531,10 @@ find_abi_tags_r (tree *tp, int *walk_subtrees, void *data) static tree mark_abi_tags_r (tree *tp, int *walk_subtrees, void *data) { + if (TYPE_P (*tp) && *walk_subtrees == 1) + /* Tell cp_walk_subtrees to look though typedefs. */ + *walk_subtrees = 2; + if (!OVERLOAD_TYPE_P (*tp)) return NULL_TREE; diff --git a/gcc/cp/decl2.c b/gcc/cp/decl2.c index b10671091b5..b087753cfba 100644 --- a/gcc/cp/decl2.c +++ b/gcc/cp/decl2.c @@ -2358,9 +2358,6 @@ min_vis_r (tree *tp, int *walk_subtrees, void *data) int this_vis = VISIBILITY_DEFAULT; if (! TYPE_P (*tp)) *walk_subtrees = 0; - else if (typedef_variant_p (*tp)) - /* Look through typedefs despite cp_walk_subtrees. */ - this_vis = type_visibility (DECL_ORIGINAL_TYPE (TYPE_NAME (*tp))); else if (OVERLOAD_TYPE_P (*tp) && !TREE_PUBLIC (TYPE_MAIN_DECL (*tp))) { @@ -2379,6 +2376,10 @@ min_vis_r (tree *tp, int *walk_subtrees, void *data) if (this_vis > *vis_p) *vis_p = this_vis; + /* Tell cp_walk_subtrees to look through typedefs. */ + if (*walk_subtrees == 1) + *walk_subtrees = 2; + return NULL; } diff --git a/gcc/cp/tree.c b/gcc/cp/tree.c index 82027cc9abf..c536eb581a7 100644 --- a/gcc/cp/tree.c +++ b/gcc/cp/tree.c @@ -5146,16 +5146,26 @@ cp_walk_subtrees (tree *tp, int *walk_subtrees_p, walk_tree_fn func, if (TYPE_P (*tp)) { - /* Walk into template args without looking through typedefs. */ - if (tree ti = TYPE_TEMPLATE_INFO_MAYBE_ALIAS (*tp)) - WALK_SUBTREE (TI_ARGS (ti)); - /* Don't look through typedefs; walk_tree_fns that want to look through - typedefs (like min_vis_r) need to do that themselves. */ - if (typedef_variant_p (*tp)) + /* If *WALK_SUBTREES_P is 1, we're interested in the syntactic form of + the argument, so don't look through typedefs, but do walk into + template arguments for alias templates (and non-typedefed classes). + + If *WALK_SUBTREES_P > 1, we're interested in type identity or + equivalence, so look through typedefs, ignoring template arguments for + alias templates, and walk into template args of classes. + + See find_abi_tags_r for an example of setting *WALK_SUBTREES_P to 2 + when that's the behavior the walk_tree_fn wants. */ + if (*walk_subtrees_p == 1 && typedef_variant_p (*tp)) { + if (tree ti = TYPE_ALIAS_TEMPLATE_INFO (*tp)) + WALK_SUBTREE (TI_ARGS (ti)); *walk_subtrees_p = 0; return NULL_TREE; } + + if (tree ti = TYPE_TEMPLATE_INFO (*tp)) + WALK_SUBTREE (TI_ARGS (ti)); } /* Not one of the easy cases. We must explicitly go through the