Hi! These simplifications are only simplifications if the (~D ^ C) or (D ^ C) expressions fold into constants, but in that case they decrease number of operations by 1.
For the first transformation I guess I should add reverse simplification when C and D are arbitrary (constants would fold before; to be tried incrementally). Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk? 2021-01-13 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> PR tree-optimization/96691 * match.pd ((~X | C) ^ D -> (X | C) ^ (~D ^ C), (~X & C) ^ D -> (X & C) ^ (D ^ C)): New simplifications for constant C and D. * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr96691.c: New test. --- gcc/match.pd.jj 2021-01-12 13:17:35.000000000 +0100 +++ gcc/match.pd 2021-01-12 21:39:51.310921835 +0100 @@ -947,6 +947,20 @@ (define_operator_list COND_TERNARY (bit_ior:c (bit_xor:c@3 @0 @1) (bit_xor:c (bit_xor:c @1 @2) @0)) (bit_ior @3 @2)) +/* (~X | C) ^ D -> (X | C) ^ (~D ^ C) if C and D are constants. */ +(simplify + (bit_xor (bit_ior:s (bit_not @0) @1) @2) + (if ((TREE_CODE (@1) == INTEGER_CST || TREE_CODE (@1) == VECTOR_CST) + && TREE_CODE (@1) == TREE_CODE (@2)) + (bit_xor (bit_ior @0 @1) (bit_xor (bit_not @2) @1)))) + +/* (~X & C) ^ D -> (X & C) ^ (D ^ C) if C and D are constants. */ +(simplify + (bit_xor (bit_and:s (bit_not @0) @1) @2) + (if ((TREE_CODE (@1) == INTEGER_CST || TREE_CODE (@1) == VECTOR_CST) + && TREE_CODE (@1) == TREE_CODE (@2)) + (bit_xor (bit_and @0 @1) (bit_xor @2 @1)))) + /* Simplify (~X & Y) to X ^ Y if we know that (X & ~Y) is 0. */ #if GIMPLE (simplify --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr96691.c.jj 2021-01-12 21:48:35.763025413 +0100 +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr96691.c 2021-01-12 21:48:19.579207370 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ +/* PR tree-optimization/96691 */ +/* { dg-do compile } */ +/* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-tree-optimized" } */ +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " \\\| 123;" 1 "optimized" } } */ +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " \\\& 123;" 1 "optimized" } } */ +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " \\\^ -315;" 1 "optimized" } } */ +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " \\\^ 314;" 1 "optimized" } } */ +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not " \\\^ 321;" "optimized" } } */ +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not " = ~" "optimized" } } */ + +int +foo (int x) +{ + return (~x | 123) ^ 321; +} + +int +bar (int x) +{ + return (~x & 123) ^ 321; +} Jakub