Ping.

On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 02:02:27PM +1030, Alan Modra wrote:
> Ping
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-October/555758.html
> 
> On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 09:27:59AM +1030, Alan Modra wrote:
> > The aim of this patch is to make rtx_costs for SETs closer to
> > insn_cost for SETs.  One visible effect on powerpc code is increased
> > if-conversion.
> > 
> >     * config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_rtx_costs): Reduce cost of SET
> >     operands.
> > 
> > diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c
> > index 76aedbfae6f..d455aa52427 100644
> > --- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c
> > +++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c
> > @@ -21684,6 +21684,35 @@ rs6000_rtx_costs (rtx x, machine_mode mode, int 
> > outer_code,
> >     }
> >        return false;
> >  
> > +    case SET:
> > +      /* On entry the value in *TOTAL is the number of general purpose
> > +    regs being set, multiplied by COSTS_N_INSNS (1).  Handle
> > +    costing of set operands specially since in most cases we have
> > +    an instruction rather than just a piece of RTL and should
> > +    return a cost comparable to insn_cost.  That's a little
> > +    complicated because in some cases the cost of SET operands is
> > +    non-zero, see point 5 above and cost of PLUS for example, and
> > +    in others it is zero, for example for (set (reg) (reg)).
> > +    But (set (reg) (reg)) has the same insn_cost as
> > +    (set (reg) (plus (reg) (reg))).  Hack around this by
> > +    subtracting COSTS_N_INSNS (1) from the operand cost in cases
> > +    were we add at least COSTS_N_INSNS (1) for some operation.
> > +    However, don't do so for constants.  Constants might cost
> > +    more than zero when they require more than one instruction,
> > +    and we do want the cost of extra instructions.  */
> > +      {
> > +   rtx_code src_code = GET_CODE (SET_SRC (x));
> > +   if (src_code == CONST_INT
> > +       || src_code == CONST_DOUBLE
> > +       || src_code == CONST_WIDE_INT)
> > +     return false;
> > +   int set_cost = (rtx_cost (SET_SRC (x), mode, SET, 1, speed)
> > +                   + rtx_cost (SET_DEST (x), mode, SET, 0, speed));
> > +   if (set_cost >= COSTS_N_INSNS (1))
> > +     *total += set_cost - COSTS_N_INSNS (1);
> > +   return true;
> > +      }
> > +
> >      default:
> >        return false;
> >      }

-- 
Alan Modra
Australia Development Lab, IBM

Reply via email to