On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 12:39:39PM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> > @@ -5197,7 +5209,7 @@ (define_insn_and_split "*lea<mode>"
> >
> >    /* ix86_avoid_lea_for_addr re-recognizes insn and may
> >       change operands[] array behind our back.  */
> > -  pat = PATTERN (curr_insn);
> > +  pat = PATTERN (peep2_next_insn (0));
> 
> I remember there were several problems with the insn, so I introduced
> the above hack. Probably, there is better solution for this...

I'm afraid the define_peephole2 conditions are called with the same problem as
define_split conditions, operands point into recog_data.operands.

I wonder if instead of doing hacks like that we just couldn't save/restore
recog_data variable around the
  dist_define = distance_non_agu_define (regno1, regno2, insn);
  dist_use = distance_agu_use (regno0, insn);
calls.

As in the following updated patch:

2021-02-16  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>

        PR target/99104
        * config/i386/i386.c (distance_non_agu_define): Don't call
        extract_insn_cached here.
        (copy_recog_data): New function.
        (ix86_lea_outperforms): Save and restore recog_data around call
        to distance_non_agu_define and distance_agu_use.
        (ix86_ok_to_clobber_flags): Remove.
        (ix86_avoid_lea_for_add): Don't call ix86_ok_to_clobber_flags.
        (ix86_avoid_lea_for_addr): Likewise.  Adjust function comment.
        * config/i386/i386.m (*lea<mode>): Change from define_insn_and_split
        into define_insn.  Move the splitting to define_peephole2 and
        check there using peep2_regno_dead_p if FLAGS_REG is dead.

        * gcc.dg/pr99104.c: New test.

--- gcc/config/i386/i386.c.jj   2021-02-16 08:58:55.197890195 +0100
+++ gcc/config/i386/i386.c      2021-02-16 13:47:15.500969539 +0100
@@ -14754,11 +14754,6 @@ distance_non_agu_define (unsigned int re
        }
     }
 
-  /* get_attr_type may modify recog data.  We want to make sure
-     that recog data is valid for instruction INSN, on which
-     distance_non_agu_define is called.  INSN is unchanged here.  */
-  extract_insn_cached (insn);
-
   if (!found)
     return -1;
 
@@ -14897,6 +14892,32 @@ distance_agu_use (unsigned int regno0, r
   return distance >> 1;
 }
 
+/* Copy recog_data_d from SRC to DEST.  */
+
+static void
+copy_recog_data (recog_data_d *dest, recog_data_d *src)
+{
+  dest->n_operands = src->n_operands;
+  dest->n_dups = src->n_dups;
+  dest->n_alternatives = src->n_alternatives;
+  dest->is_asm = src->is_asm;
+  dest->insn = src->insn;
+  for (int i = 0; i < src->n_operands; i++)
+    {
+      dest->operand[i] = src->operand[i];
+      dest->operand_loc[i] = src->operand_loc[i];
+      dest->constraints[i] = src->constraints[i];
+      dest->is_operator[i] = src->is_operator[i];
+      dest->operand_mode[i] = src->operand_mode[i];
+      dest->operand_type[i] = src->operand_type[i];
+    }
+  for (int i = 0; i < src->n_dups; i++)
+    {
+      dest->dup_loc[i] = src->dup_loc[i];
+      dest->dup_num[i] = src->dup_num[i];
+    }
+}
+
 /* Define this macro to tune LEA priority vs ADD, it take effect when
    there is a dilemma of choosing LEA or ADD
    Negative value: ADD is more preferred than LEA
@@ -14928,17 +14949,16 @@ ix86_lea_outperforms (rtx_insn *insn, un
       return true;
     }
 
-  rtx_insn *rinsn = recog_data.insn;
+  /* Remember recog_data content.  */
+  struct recog_data_d recog_data_copy;
+  copy_recog_data (&recog_data_copy, &recog_data);
 
   dist_define = distance_non_agu_define (regno1, regno2, insn);
   dist_use = distance_agu_use (regno0, insn);
 
-  /* distance_non_agu_define can call extract_insn_cached.  If this function
-     is called from define_split conditions, that can break insn splitting,
-     because split_insns works by clearing recog_data.insn and then modifying
-     recog_data.operand array and match the various split conditions.  */
-  if (recog_data.insn != rinsn)
-    recog_data.insn = NULL;
+  /* distance_non_agu_define can call get_attr_type which can call
+     recog_memoized, restore recog_data back to previous content.  */
+  copy_recog_data (&recog_data, &recog_data_copy);
 
   if (dist_define < 0 || dist_define >= LEA_MAX_STALL)
     {
@@ -14968,38 +14988,6 @@ ix86_lea_outperforms (rtx_insn *insn, un
   return dist_define >= dist_use;
 }
 
-/* Return true if it is legal to clobber flags by INSN and
-   false otherwise.  */
-
-static bool
-ix86_ok_to_clobber_flags (rtx_insn *insn)
-{
-  basic_block bb = BLOCK_FOR_INSN (insn);
-  df_ref use;
-  bitmap live;
-
-  while (insn)
-    {
-      if (NONDEBUG_INSN_P (insn))
-       {
-         FOR_EACH_INSN_USE (use, insn)
-           if (DF_REF_REG_USE_P (use) && DF_REF_REGNO (use) == FLAGS_REG)
-             return false;
-
-         if (insn_defines_reg (FLAGS_REG, INVALID_REGNUM, insn))
-           return true;
-       }
-
-      if (insn == BB_END (bb))
-       break;
-
-      insn = NEXT_INSN (insn);
-    }
-
-  live = df_get_live_out(bb);
-  return !REGNO_REG_SET_P (live, FLAGS_REG);
-}
-
 /* Return true if we need to split op0 = op1 + op2 into a sequence of
    move and add to avoid AGU stalls.  */
 
@@ -15012,10 +15000,6 @@ ix86_avoid_lea_for_add (rtx_insn *insn,
   if (!TARGET_OPT_AGU || optimize_function_for_size_p (cfun))
     return false;
 
-  /* Check it is correct to split here.  */
-  if (!ix86_ok_to_clobber_flags(insn))
-    return false;
-
   regno0 = true_regnum (operands[0]);
   regno1 = true_regnum (operands[1]);
   regno2 = true_regnum (operands[2]);
@@ -15051,7 +15035,7 @@ ix86_use_lea_for_mov (rtx_insn *insn, rt
 }
 
 /* Return true if we need to split lea into a sequence of
-   instructions to avoid AGU stalls. */
+   instructions to avoid AGU stalls during peephole2. */
 
 bool
 ix86_avoid_lea_for_addr (rtx_insn *insn, rtx operands[])
@@ -15071,10 +15055,6 @@ ix86_avoid_lea_for_addr (rtx_insn *insn,
          && REG_P (XEXP (operands[1], 0))))
     return false;
 
-  /* Check if it is OK to split here.  */
-  if (!ix86_ok_to_clobber_flags (insn))
-    return false;
-
   ok = ix86_decompose_address (operands[1], &parts);
   gcc_assert (ok);
 
--- gcc/config/i386/i386.md.jj  2021-01-13 10:12:07.036506101 +0100
+++ gcc/config/i386/i386.md     2021-02-16 13:48:13.650317709 +0100
@@ -5176,7 +5176,7 @@ (define_expand "floatunsdidf2"
 
 ;; Load effective address instructions
 
-(define_insn_and_split "*lea<mode>"
+(define_insn "*lea<mode>"
   [(set (match_operand:SWI48 0 "register_operand" "=r")
        (match_operand:SWI48 1 "address_no_seg_operand" "Ts"))]
   "ix86_hardreg_mov_ok (operands[0], operands[1])"
@@ -5189,38 +5189,36 @@ (define_insn_and_split "*lea<mode>"
   else 
     return "lea{<imodesuffix>}\t{%E1, %0|%0, %E1}";
 }
-  "reload_completed && ix86_avoid_lea_for_addr (insn, operands)"
+  [(set_attr "type" "lea")
+   (set (attr "mode")
+     (if_then_else
+       (match_operand 1 "SImode_address_operand")
+       (const_string "SI")
+       (const_string "<MODE>")))])
+
+(define_peephole2
+  [(set (match_operand:SWI48 0 "register_operand")
+       (match_operand:SWI48 1 "address_no_seg_operand"))]
+  "ix86_hardreg_mov_ok (operands[0], operands[1])
+   && peep2_regno_dead_p (0, FLAGS_REG)
+   && ix86_avoid_lea_for_addr (peep2_next_insn (0), operands)"
   [(const_int 0)]
 {
   machine_mode mode = <MODE>mode;
-  rtx pat;
-
-  /* ix86_avoid_lea_for_addr re-recognizes insn and may
-     change operands[] array behind our back.  */
-  pat = PATTERN (curr_insn);
-
-  operands[0] = SET_DEST (pat);
-  operands[1] = SET_SRC (pat);
 
   /* Emit all operations in SImode for zero-extended addresses.  */
   if (SImode_address_operand (operands[1], VOIDmode))
     mode = SImode;
 
-  ix86_split_lea_for_addr (curr_insn, operands, mode);
+  ix86_split_lea_for_addr (peep2_next_insn (0), operands, mode);
 
   /* Zero-extend return register to DImode for zero-extended addresses.  */
   if (mode != <MODE>mode)
-    emit_insn (gen_zero_extendsidi2
-              (operands[0], gen_lowpart (mode, operands[0])));
+    emit_insn (gen_zero_extendsidi2 (operands[0],
+                                    gen_lowpart (mode, operands[0])));
 
   DONE;
-}
-  [(set_attr "type" "lea")
-   (set (attr "mode")
-     (if_then_else
-       (match_operand 1 "SImode_address_operand")
-       (const_string "SI")
-       (const_string "<MODE>")))])
+})
 
 ;; Add instructions
 
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr99104.c.jj   2021-02-16 11:47:08.793255200 +0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr99104.c      2021-02-16 11:47:08.793255200 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+/* PR target/99104 */
+/* { dg-do compile { target int128 } } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -fsel-sched-pipelining -fselective-scheduling2 
-funroll-loops" } */
+
+__int128 a;
+int b;
+int foo (void);
+
+int __attribute__ ((simd))
+bar (void)
+{
+  a = ~a;
+  if (foo ())
+    b = 0;
+}


        Jakub

Reply via email to