On Tue, 16 Feb 2021, Jeff Law via Gcc-patches wrote: > I think this will be OK once the wording in patch 2/3 of this series is > fixed.
As I noted with 2/3 I would like to know what this extra complication is exactly needed for, and then whether we can't reuse the existing options. Once settled I think it would best be placed in the change description for posterity, so that discussions do not have to be chased like I had to with the original change (when we had a different policy on commit messages). Maciej
