Andrea Corallo via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> writes: > David Malcolm via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> writes: > >> I tried several approaches to fixing this; this seemed the >> least invasive. > > Hi Dave, > > thanks for fixing this. > > I do have a trivial question: are we guaranteed that the middle-end will > not try to add any build-in other than a trap?
Ah also, shouldn't the fix be also back-ported? Thanks Andrea