On 01/03/2021 15:26, Christophe Lyon via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Ping?
>
> On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 at 10:01, Christophe Lyon <christophe.l...@linaro.org>
> wrote:
>>
>> Ping?
>> I guess that's obvious enough?
>>
>> On Wed, 27 Jan 2021 at 10:03, Christophe Lyon
>> <christophe.l...@linaro.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Depending on how the toolchain is configured or how the testsuite is
>>> executed, -mthumb may not be compatible. Like for other tests, skip
>>> pr97969.c in this case.
>>>
>>> For instance arm-linux-gnueabihf and -march=armv5t in RUNTESTFLAGS.
>>>
>>> 2021-01-27 Christophe Lyon <christophe.l...@linaro.org>
>>>
>>> gcc/testsuite/
>>> PR target/97969
>>> * gcc.target/arm/pr97969.c: Skip if thumb mode is not available.
>>>
>>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr97969.c
>>> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr97969.c
>>> index 714a1d1..0b5d07f 100644
>>> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr97969.c
>>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr97969.c
>>> @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
>>> /* { dg-do compile } */
>>> +/* { dg-skip-if "" { ! { arm_thumb1_ok || arm_thumb2_ok } } } */
>>> /* { dg-options "-std=c99 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mthumb -w -Os" } */
>>>
>>> typedef a[23];
I'm working on a patch to make this sort of change unnecessary (I hope).
Just running some final checks.
R.
