Hi, ping? Could someone take a look at this patch, it has already been reviewed several rounds. I'm to submit it to gcc trunk.
Thanks, -Han On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 9:41 PM, <davi...@google.com> wrote: > > ok for google branches with the above changes. Please continue to seek > upstream approval. > > David > > > http://codereview.appspot.com/5461043/diff/19001/gcc/doc/invoke.texi > File gcc/doc/invoke.texi (right): > > http://codereview.appspot.com/5461043/diff/19001/gcc/doc/invoke.texi#newcode403 > gcc/doc/invoke.texi:403: +-fstack-protector-strong -fstack-protector-all > -fstrict-aliasing @gol > Switch the order of -fstack-protector-all and -fstack-proctor-strong (in > alphabetic order) > > http://codereview.appspot.com/5461043/diff/19001/gcc/doc/invoke.texi#newcode8446 > gcc/doc/invoke.texi:8446: +@item -fstack-protector-strong > Move this item after -fstack-protector-all > > http://codereview.appspot.com/5461043/
