On 3/12/21 2:56 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
On Fri, 2021-03-12 at 09:45 +0100, Martin Liška wrote:
Identified by my check that compares documentation of params
with content of --help=param output.
Pushed as obvious.
Martin
Thanks.
Which check is this, BTW? (presumably this is something I should add
to my patch testing workflow)
./gcc/xgcc -Bgcc --help=param &>params.txt
../contrib/check-params-in-docs.py ../gcc/doc/invoke.texi params.txt
Cheers,
Martin
Dave
gcc/ChangeLog:
* doc/invoke.texi: Add missing param documentation.
---
gcc/doc/invoke.texi | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
index 4a3c1e2fa0f..7a368959e5e 100644
--- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
@@ -14362,6 +14362,10 @@ recurse deeper.
The maximum depth of a symbolic value, before approximating
the value as unknown.
+@item analyzer-max-infeasible-edges
+The maximum number of infeasible edges to reject before declaring
+a diagnostic as infeasible.
+
@item gimple-fe-computed-hot-bb-threshold
The number of executions of a basic block which is considered hot.
The parameter is used only in GIMPLE FE.
