On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 09:46:33AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > shows we have an interface problem here -- we shouldn't need something this
> > convoluted to walk through an argument list. But that's not your problem
> > or a problem with the patch.
>
> The caller side should IMHO always look at TYPE_ARG_TYPES since
> that's what determines the ABI. But IIRC there were problems in the past
> that TYPE_ARG_TYPES might be NULL but DECL_ARGUMENTS not?!
Yes, for the K&R definitions
#pragma omp declare simd
int
foo (a, b, c)
int a, b, c;
{
return a + b + c;
}
Jakub
