Re: [PATCH] c++: Private parent access check for using decls [PR19377]

[Jason Merrill via Gcc-patches]

On 3/10/21 4:14 PM, Anthony Sharp wrote:
Hiya
That's because none of the names are overloaded within a single base
class.

Ah, thanks. Thought there must be something I wasn't thinking of.

Also, you can use == instead of cp_tree_equal for comparing FUNCTION_DECLs.

Changed it.

Latest patch is attached. Compiles fine and no regressions.

Great!  You may have already noticed that I applied the patch with a 
little simplification: we can use ovl_iterator for non-overloaded decls 
as well.

Thanks,
Jason