On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 11:44 PM H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> If we never generate function body, we shouldn't issue errors for return
> nor argument.  Add init_cumulative_args_called to i386 machine_function
> to avoid issuing errors for return and argument without function body.
>
> gcc/
>
>         PR target/99652
>         * config/i386/i386.c (init_cumulative_args): Set
>         init_cumulative_args_called to true.
>         (construct_container): Issue error for return and argument only
>         if init_cumulative_args_called is true.
>         * config/i386/i386.h (machine_function): Add
>         init_cumulative_args_called.
>
> gcc/testsuite/
>
>         PR target/99652
>         * gcc.dg/torture/pr99652-1.c: New test.
>         * gcc.dg/torture/pr99652-2.c: Likewise.
>         * gcc.target/i386/pr57655.c: Adjusted.
>         * gcc.target/i386/pr59794-6.c: Likewise.
>         * gcc.target/i386/pr70738-1.c: Likewise.
>         * gcc.target/i386/pr96744-1.c: Likewise.
> ---
>  gcc/config/i386/i386.c                    | 26 ++++++++++++++---------
>  gcc/config/i386/i386.h                    |  3 +++
>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr99652-1.c  |  8 +++++++
>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr99652-2.c  |  8 +++++++
>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr57655.c   |  4 ++--
>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr59794-6.c |  4 ++--
>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr70738-1.c |  4 ++--
>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr96744-1.c |  4 ++--
>  8 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr99652-1.c
>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr99652-2.c
>
> diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
> index 540d4f44517..4a0b8c73bef 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
> +++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
> @@ -1705,6 +1705,8 @@ init_cumulative_args (CUMULATIVE_ARGS *cum,  /* 
> Argument info to initialize */
>    struct cgraph_node *local_info_node = NULL;
>    struct cgraph_node *target = NULL;
>
> +  cfun->machine->init_cumulative_args_called = true;
> +
>    memset (cum, 0, sizeof (*cum));
>
>    if (fndecl)
> @@ -2534,18 +2536,21 @@ construct_container (machine_mode mode, machine_mode 
> orig_mode,
>       some less clueful developer tries to use floating-point anyway.  */
>    if (needed_sseregs && !TARGET_SSE)
>      {
> -      if (in_return)
> +      if (cfun->machine->init_cumulative_args_called)

Please make this an early return, with appropriate comment.

>         {
> -         if (!issued_sse_ret_error)
> +         if (in_return)
>             {
> -             error ("SSE register return with SSE disabled");
> -             issued_sse_ret_error = true;
> +             if (!issued_sse_ret_error)
> +               {
> +                 error ("SSE register return with SSE disabled");
> +                 issued_sse_ret_error = true;
> +               }
> +           }
> +         else if (!issued_sse_arg_error)
> +           {
> +             error ("SSE register argument with SSE disabled");
> +             issued_sse_arg_error = true;
>             }
> -       }
> -      else if (!issued_sse_arg_error)
> -       {
> -         error ("SSE register argument with SSE disabled");
> -         issued_sse_arg_error = true;
>         }
>        return NULL;
>      }
> @@ -2558,7 +2563,8 @@ construct_container (machine_mode mode, machine_mode 
> orig_mode,
>           || regclass[i] == X86_64_X87UP_CLASS
>           || regclass[i] == X86_64_COMPLEX_X87_CLASS)
>         {
> -         if (!issued_x87_ret_error)
> +         if (cfun->machine->init_cumulative_args_called
> +             && !issued_x87_ret_error)

Also, early return.

>             {
>               error ("x87 register return with x87 disabled");
>               issued_x87_ret_error = true;
> diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.h b/gcc/config/i386/i386.h
> index 48749104b24..ad908c010b3 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.h
> +++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.h
> @@ -2945,6 +2945,9 @@ struct GTY(()) machine_function {
>       function.  */
>    BOOL_BITFIELD has_explicit_vzeroupper : 1;
>
> +  /* If true if init_cumulative_args has been called.  */
> +  BOOL_BITFIELD init_cumulative_args_called: 1;

I think that we should follow aarch64 lead and name it silent_p. The
comment also suits our needs.

  bool silent_p;        /* True if we should act silently, rather than
                   raise an error for invalid calls.  */

Uros.

> +
>    /* The largest alignment, in bytes, of stack slot actually used.  */
>    unsigned int max_used_stack_alignment;
>
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr99652-1.c 
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr99652-1.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..c2395ff4ed8
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr99652-1.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
> +/* { dg-do compile { target i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* } } */
> +/* { dg-options "-mgeneral-regs-only" } */
> +
> +inline double
> +foo (void)
> +{
> +  return 1.0;
> +}
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr99652-2.c 
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr99652-2.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..beefad8bfee
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr99652-2.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
> +/* { dg-do compile { target i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* } } */
> +/* { dg-options "-mno-80387" } */
> +
> +inline double
> +foo (void)
> +{
> +  return 1.0;
> +}
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr57655.c 
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr57655.c
> index 33a59d3a263..649cdef832d 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr57655.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr57655.c
> @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
>  /* { dg-options "-mavx -mvzeroupper -mno-fp-ret-in-387" } */
>
>  long double
> -foo (long double x)
> -{ /* { dg-error "x87 register return with x87 disabled" "" { target { ! ia32 
> } } } */
> +foo (long double x) /* { dg-error "x87 register return with x87 disabled" "" 
> { target { ! ia32 } } } */
> +{
>    return __builtin_ilogbl (x);
>  }
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr59794-6.c 
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr59794-6.c
> index c809f957927..babcf76eaf8 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr59794-6.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr59794-6.c
> @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ typedef int __v4si __attribute__ ((__vector_size__ (16)));
>  extern __v4si x;
>
>  __v4si
> -foo (void)
> -{ /* { dg-error "SSE register return with SSE disabled" } */
> +foo (void) /* { dg-error "SSE register return with SSE disabled" } */
> +{
>    return x;
>  }
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr70738-1.c 
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr70738-1.c
> index 19381c26932..62d609c9f66 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr70738-1.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr70738-1.c
> @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
>
>  typedef int int32x2_t __attribute__ ((__vector_size__ ((8))));
>
> -int32x2_t test (int32x2_t a, int32x2_t b)
> -{ /* { dg-error "SSE register return with SSE disabled" } */
> +int32x2_t test (int32x2_t a, int32x2_t b) /* { dg-error "SSE register return 
> with SSE disabled" } */
> +{
>    return a + b;
>  }
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr96744-1.c 
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr96744-1.c
> index 46f3ce6ddd4..da5557d89b7 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr96744-1.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr96744-1.c
> @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
>  typedef int int32x2_t __attribute__ ((__vector_size__ ((8))));
>
>  __attribute__((__target__("general-regs-only")))
> -int32x2_t test (int32x2_t a, int32x2_t b)
> -{ /* { dg-error "SSE register return with SSE disabled" } */
> +int32x2_t test (int32x2_t a, int32x2_t b) /* { dg-error "SSE register return 
> with SSE disabled" } */
> +{
>    return a + b;
>  }
> --
> 2.30.2
>

Reply via email to