On 4/19/21 5:17 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
This is an ICE-on-invalid, but I keep seeing it when reducing code so
I'd like to fix it.  We crash on

   template <typename> void forward() {
     concept C = true;
   }

which breaks two requirements:
[temp.concept]/1: A concept is a template ...
[temp.concept]/3: A concept-definition shall inhabit a namespace scope.

This patch adds a test that exercises broken code and fixes the ICE
by checking that a concept-definition is defined at namespace scope.

Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk?

OK.

gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

        PR c++/97536
        * decl.c (grokvardecl): Given an error when a concept is not defined
        at namespace scope.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

        PR c++/97536
        * g++.dg/concepts/diagnostic16.C: New test.
---
  gcc/cp/decl.c                                |  6 +++
  gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/concepts/diagnostic16.C | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++
  2 files changed, 51 insertions(+)
  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/concepts/diagnostic16.C

diff --git a/gcc/cp/decl.c b/gcc/cp/decl.c
index 942eb318f2c..b81de8ef934 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/decl.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/decl.c
@@ -10365,6 +10365,12 @@ grokvardecl (tree type,
                    "a non-template variable cannot be %<concept%>");
            return NULL_TREE;
          }
+      else if (!at_namespace_scope_p ())
+       {
+         error_at (declspecs->locations[ds_concept],
+                   "concept must be defined at namespace scope");
+         return NULL_TREE;
+       }
        else
          DECL_DECLARED_CONCEPT_P (decl) = true;
        if (!same_type_ignoring_top_level_qualifiers_p (type, 
boolean_type_node))
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/concepts/diagnostic16.C 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/concepts/diagnostic16.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..fcba535a876
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/concepts/diagnostic16.C
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+// PR c++/97536
+// { dg-do compile { target concepts } }
+
+template<typename>
+concept C1 = true;
+
+concept C2 = true; // { dg-error "non-template variable cannot be .concept." }
+// { dg-error "concept definition syntax is" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 }
+
+template<typename>
+void fn1 ()
+{
+  concept bar = true; // { dg-error "concept must be defined at namespace 
scope" }
+// { dg-error "concept definition syntax is" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 }
+}
+
+void fn2 ()
+{
+  concept bar = true; // { dg-error "non-template variable cannot be 
.concept." }
+// { dg-error "concept definition syntax is" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 }
+}
+
+template<typename>
+void fn3 ()
+{
+  template<typename> // { dg-error "template declaration cannot appear at block 
scope" }
+  concept bar = true;
+}
+
+void fn4 ()
+{
+  template<typename> // { dg-error "template declaration cannot appear at block 
scope" }
+  concept bar = true;
+}
+
+void fn5 ()
+{
+  C1 auto x = 42;
+}
+
+template<typename>
+void fn6 ()
+{
+  C1 auto x = 42;
+}

base-commit: 329d2f0df7d6d22c87ab3338b94caef68139cd58


Reply via email to