On 19/04/21 12:23 -0700, Thomas Rodgers wrote:
+ template<typename _Up, typename _ValFn,
+ typename _Spin = __default_spin_policy>
+ static bool
+ _S_do_spin_v(__platform_wait_t* __addr,
+ const _Up& __old, _ValFn __vfn,
+ __platform_wait_t& __val,
+ _Spin __spin = _Spin{ })
+ {
+ auto const __pred = [=]
+ { return __atomic_compare(__old, __vfn()); };
This doesn't compile, there are 28 FAILs in 29_atomics/*
FAIL: 29_atomics/atomic_integral/cons/value_init.cc (test for excess errors)
It needs to be qualified as __detail::__atomic_compare.
I was hoping to push this to trunk and gcc-11 for the gcc-11 release,
but I'm a bit concerned now.
