On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 6:27 PM, Steven Bosscher <stevenb....@gmail.com> wrote:

>>        PR target/28685
>>        * config/i386/i386.c (TARGET_FLAGS_REGNUM): New.
>>
>
> Hmm, how is this (apparently new in 2011) TARGET_FLAGS_REGNUM
> different from the older targetm.fixed_condition_code_regs?

This is how backend enables the pass, please see
gate_compare_elim_after_reload function in gcc/compare-elim.c.

FWIW, the value could be anything != INVALID_REGNUM.

Uros.

Reply via email to