John Paul Adrian Glaubitz writes:
> On 4/28/21 7:59 PM, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj wrote: >>>> OK for trunk. >>> >>> Anything else that keeps us from merging the changes? Would be great to >>> have the last backend besides CR-16 finally converted to MODE_CC on trunk. >> >> Nope. Committed and pushed just now - >> https://gcc.gnu.org/git?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=3ba781d3b5c8efadb60866c9743b657e8f0eb222 > > Awesome \o/. Should we wait for the second patch [1] to be merged as well > before closing the PR? [2] I guess it depends on the scope of the PR? If it was about removing cc0, then this patch would do. If it was about getting the generated code also to be as close to what it was with cc0, then no, it cannot be closed. OTOH, while the second patch (adjusting peepholes) does help, there are other things in the pipeline - addition of new CC modes and enabling compare elimination, adjusting rtx costs etc. I will continue to work on them in my spare time and submit patches when ready. Regards Senthil > > Adrian > >> [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-April/568659.html >> [2] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92729
