On 5/3/21 1:09 PM, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote: > On Fri, 2021-04-30 at 08:49 +0200, Andreas Krebbel wrote: >> On 4/28/21 3:48 AM, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote: >>> Bootstrapped and regtested on s390x-redhat-linux. Tested with >>> valgrind >>> too (PR 100278 is now fixed). Ok for master? >>> >>> v1: >>> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-April/568771.html >>> v1 -> v2: Use the UNSPEC pattern, which is less efficient, but is >>> more >>> on the "obviously correct" side than gen_raw_SUBREG(). >>> >>> >>> >>> gen_fprx2_to_tf() and gen_tf_to_fprx2() cannot handle hard >>> registers, >>> since the subregs they create do not pass validation. Change >>> s390_md_asm_adjust() to manually copy between hard VRs and FPRs >>> instead >>> of using these two functions. >>> >>> gcc/ChangeLog: >>> >>> PR target/100217 >>> * config/s390/s390.c (s390_hard_fp_reg_p): New function. >>> (s390_md_asm_adjust): Handle hard registers. >>> >>> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: >>> >>> PR target/100217 >>> * gcc.target/s390/vector/long-double-asm-in-out-hard-fp- >>> reg.c: New test. >>> * gcc.target/s390/vector/long-double-asm-inout-hard-fp- >>> reg.c: New test. >> >> Ok. Thanks! >> >> Andreas > > Thanks! > > I forgot to ask: ok for gcc-11 branch?
Ok for GCC 11 branch as well. Thanks! Andreas
