A simple, self-explaining patch to avoid a wrong warning. Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
OK for mainline? Affected branches? Thanks, Harald PR fortran/98411 - Pointless warning for static variables Variables with explicit SAVE attribute cannot end up on the stack. There is no point in checking whether they should be moved off the stack to static storage. gcc/fortran/ChangeLog: PR fortran/98411 * trans-decl.c (gfc_finish_var_decl): Add check for explicit SAVE attribute. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: PR fortran/98411 * gfortran.dg/pr98411.f90: New test.
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c b/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c index cc9d85543ca..7cded0a3ede 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c +++ b/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c @@ -738,6 +738,7 @@ gfc_finish_var_decl (tree decl, gfc_symbol * sym) /* Keep variables larger than max-stack-var-size off stack. */ if (!(sym->ns->proc_name && sym->ns->proc_name->attr.recursive) && !sym->attr.automatic + && sym->attr.save != SAVE_EXPLICIT && INTEGER_CST_P (DECL_SIZE_UNIT (decl)) && !gfc_can_put_var_on_stack (DECL_SIZE_UNIT (decl)) /* Put variable length auto array pointers always into stack. */ diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr98411.f90 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr98411.f90 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..249afaea419 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr98411.f90 @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +! { dg-do compile } +! { dg-options "-Wall -fautomatic -fmax-stack-var-size=100" } +! PR fortran/98411 - Pointless warning for static variables + +module try + implicit none + integer, save :: a(1000) +contains + subroutine initmodule + real, save :: b(1000) + logical :: c(1000) ! { dg-warning "moved from stack to static storage" } + a(1) = 42 + b(2) = 3.14 + c(3) = .true. + end subroutine initmodule +end module try