On 6/8/21 8:25 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
We weren't passing 'flags' to the recursive call to cp_parser_declarator
in the ptr-operator case and as an effect, delayed parsing of noexcept
didn't work as advertised. The following change passes more than just
CP_PARSER_FLAGS_DELAY_NOEXCEPT but that doesn't seem to break anything.
I'm not passing member_p because I don't need it and because it breaks
a few tests.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk/branches?
PR c++/100752
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* parser.c (cp_parser_declarator): Pass flags down to
cp_parser_declarator.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept69.C: New test.
---
gcc/cp/parser.c | 3 +--
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept69.C | 12 ++++++++++++
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept69.C
diff --git a/gcc/cp/parser.c b/gcc/cp/parser.c
index d59a829d0b9..5930990ec1c 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/parser.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/parser.c
@@ -22066,8 +22066,7 @@ cp_parser_declarator (cp_parser* parser,
cp_parser_parse_tentatively (parser);
/* Parse the dependent declarator. */
- declarator = cp_parser_declarator (parser, dcl_kind,
- CP_PARSER_FLAGS_NONE,
+ declarator = cp_parser_declarator (parser, dcl_kind, flags,
/*ctor_dtor_or_conv_p=*/NULL,
/*parenthesized_p=*/NULL,
/*member_p=*/false,
Should the other parameters also be passed down? I'd think definitely
member_p and static_p, not sure about ctor_dtor_or_conv_p and
parenthesized_p.
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept69.C
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept69.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..9b87ba0cafb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept69.C
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+// PR c++/100752
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+struct S {
+ void f() noexcept {}
+ S &g() noexcept(noexcept(f())) { f(); return *this; }
+};
+
+struct X {
+ int& f() noexcept(noexcept(i));
+ int i;
+};
base-commit: c4574d23cb07340918793a5a98ae7bb2988b3791
