From: Andrew Pinski <apin...@marvell.com>
HONOR_SIGNED_ZEROS, HONOR_SIGN_DEPENDENT_ROUNDING, and HONOR_SNANS all
have an overload for taking a tree type now, so we should do that instead.
OK? Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux-gnu.
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR middle-end/101237
* fold-const.c (negate_expr_p): Remove call to element_mode
and TREE_MODE/TREE_TYPE when calling HONOR_SIGNED_ZEROS,
HONOR_SIGN_DEPENDENT_ROUNDING, and HONOR_SNANS.
(fold_negate_expr_1): Likewise.
(const_unop): Likewise.
(fold_cond_expr_with_comparison): Likewise.
(fold_binary_loc): Likewise.
(fold_ternary_loc): Likewise.
(tree_call_nonnegative_warnv_p): Likewise.
* match.pd (-(A + B) -> (-B) - A): Likewise.
---
gcc/fold-const.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
gcc/match.pd | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/fold-const.c b/gcc/fold-const.c
index dfccbaec683..e0cdb75fb26 100644
--- a/gcc/fold-const.c
+++ b/gcc/fold-const.c
@@ -432,8 +432,8 @@ negate_expr_p (tree t)
return negate_expr_p (TREE_OPERAND (t, 0));
case PLUS_EXPR:
- if (HONOR_SIGN_DEPENDENT_ROUNDING (element_mode (type))
- || HONOR_SIGNED_ZEROS (element_mode (type))
+ if (HONOR_SIGN_DEPENDENT_ROUNDING (type)
+ || HONOR_SIGNED_ZEROS (type)
|| (ANY_INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type)
&& ! TYPE_OVERFLOW_WRAPS (type)))
return false;
@@ -445,8 +445,8 @@ negate_expr_p (tree t)
case MINUS_EXPR:
/* We can't turn -(A-B) into B-A when we honor signed zeros. */
- return !HONOR_SIGN_DEPENDENT_ROUNDING (element_mode (type))
- && !HONOR_SIGNED_ZEROS (element_mode (type))
+ return !HONOR_SIGN_DEPENDENT_ROUNDING (type)
+ && !HONOR_SIGNED_ZEROS (type)
&& (! ANY_INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type)
|| TYPE_OVERFLOW_WRAPS (type));
@@ -468,7 +468,7 @@ negate_expr_p (tree t)
/* Fall through. */
case RDIV_EXPR:
- if (! HONOR_SIGN_DEPENDENT_ROUNDING (element_mode (TREE_TYPE (t))))
+ if (! HONOR_SIGN_DEPENDENT_ROUNDING (t))
return negate_expr_p (TREE_OPERAND (t, 1))
|| negate_expr_p (TREE_OPERAND (t, 0));
break;
@@ -605,8 +605,8 @@ fold_negate_expr_1 (location_t loc, tree t)
break;
case PLUS_EXPR:
- if (!HONOR_SIGN_DEPENDENT_ROUNDING (element_mode (type))
- && !HONOR_SIGNED_ZEROS (element_mode (type)))
+ if (!HONOR_SIGN_DEPENDENT_ROUNDING (type)
+ && !HONOR_SIGNED_ZEROS (type))
{
/* -(A + B) -> (-B) - A. */
if (negate_expr_p (TREE_OPERAND (t, 1)))
@@ -628,8 +628,8 @@ fold_negate_expr_1 (location_t loc, tree t)
case MINUS_EXPR:
/* - (A - B) -> B - A */
- if (!HONOR_SIGN_DEPENDENT_ROUNDING (element_mode (type))
- && !HONOR_SIGNED_ZEROS (element_mode (type)))
+ if (!HONOR_SIGN_DEPENDENT_ROUNDING (type)
+ && !HONOR_SIGNED_ZEROS (type))
return fold_build2_loc (loc, MINUS_EXPR, type,
TREE_OPERAND (t, 1), TREE_OPERAND (t, 0));
break;
@@ -641,7 +641,7 @@ fold_negate_expr_1 (location_t loc, tree t)
/* Fall through. */
case RDIV_EXPR:
- if (! HONOR_SIGN_DEPENDENT_ROUNDING (element_mode (type)))
+ if (! HONOR_SIGN_DEPENDENT_ROUNDING (type))
{
tem = TREE_OPERAND (t, 1);
if (negate_expr_p (tem))
@@ -1725,7 +1725,7 @@ const_unop (enum tree_code code, tree type, tree arg0)
/* Don't perform the operation, other than NEGATE and ABS, if
flag_signaling_nans is on and the operand is a signaling NaN. */
if (TREE_CODE (arg0) == REAL_CST
- && HONOR_SNANS (TYPE_MODE (TREE_TYPE (arg0)))
+ && HONOR_SNANS (arg0)
&& REAL_VALUE_ISSIGNALING_NAN (TREE_REAL_CST (arg0))
&& code != NEGATE_EXPR
&& code != ABS_EXPR
@@ -2135,7 +2135,7 @@ fold_convert_const_real_from_real (tree type, const_tree
arg1)
/* Don't perform the operation if flag_signaling_nans is on
and the operand is a signaling NaN. */
- if (HONOR_SNANS (TYPE_MODE (TREE_TYPE (arg1)))
+ if (HONOR_SNANS (arg1)
&& REAL_VALUE_ISSIGNALING_NAN (TREE_REAL_CST (arg1)))
return NULL_TREE;
@@ -5773,7 +5773,7 @@ fold_cond_expr_with_comparison (location_t loc, tree type,
Note that all these transformations are correct if A is
NaN, since the two alternatives (A and -A) are also NaNs. */
- if (!HONOR_SIGNED_ZEROS (element_mode (type))
+ if (!HONOR_SIGNED_ZEROS (type)
&& (FLOAT_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (arg01))
? real_zerop (arg01)
: integer_zerop (arg01))
@@ -5842,7 +5842,7 @@ fold_cond_expr_with_comparison (location_t loc, tree type,
both transformations are correct when A is NaN: A != 0
is then true, and A == 0 is false. */
- if (!HONOR_SIGNED_ZEROS (element_mode (type))
+ if (!HONOR_SIGNED_ZEROS (type)
&& integer_zerop (arg01) && integer_zerop (arg2))
{
if (comp_code == NE_EXPR)
@@ -5877,7 +5877,7 @@ fold_cond_expr_with_comparison (location_t loc, tree type,
a number and A is not. The conditions in the original
expressions will be false, so all four give B. The min()
and max() versions would give a NaN instead. */
- if (!HONOR_SIGNED_ZEROS (element_mode (type))
+ if (!HONOR_SIGNED_ZEROS (type)
&& operand_equal_for_comparison_p (arg01, arg2)
/* Avoid these transformations if the COND_EXPR may be used
as an lvalue in the C++ front-end. PR c++/19199. */
@@ -11005,8 +11005,8 @@ fold_binary_loc (location_t loc, enum tree_code code,
tree type,
/* Fold __complex__ ( x, 0 ) + __complex__ ( 0, y )
to __complex__ ( x, y ). This is not the same for SNaNs or
if signed zeros are involved. */
- if (!HONOR_SNANS (element_mode (arg0))
- && !HONOR_SIGNED_ZEROS (element_mode (arg0))
+ if (!HONOR_SNANS (arg0)
+ && !HONOR_SIGNED_ZEROS (arg0)
&& COMPLEX_FLOAT_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (arg0)))
{
tree rtype = TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (arg0));
@@ -11404,8 +11404,8 @@ fold_binary_loc (location_t loc, enum tree_code code,
tree type,
/* Fold __complex__ ( x, 0 ) - __complex__ ( 0, y ) to
__complex__ ( x, -y ). This is not the same for SNaNs or if
signed zeros are involved. */
- if (!HONOR_SNANS (element_mode (arg0))
- && !HONOR_SIGNED_ZEROS (element_mode (arg0))
+ if (!HONOR_SNANS (arg0)
+ && !HONOR_SIGNED_ZEROS (arg0)
&& COMPLEX_FLOAT_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (arg0)))
{
tree rtype = TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (arg0));
@@ -11509,7 +11509,7 @@ fold_binary_loc (location_t loc, enum tree_code code,
tree type,
This is not the same for NaNs or if signed zeros are
involved. */
if (!HONOR_NANS (arg0)
- && !HONOR_SIGNED_ZEROS (element_mode (arg0))
+ && !HONOR_SIGNED_ZEROS (arg0)
&& COMPLEX_FLOAT_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (arg0))
&& TREE_CODE (arg1) == COMPLEX_CST
&& real_zerop (TREE_REALPART (arg1)))
@@ -12819,7 +12819,7 @@ fold_ternary_loc (location_t loc, enum tree_code code,
tree type,
Also try swapping the arguments and inverting the conditional. */
if (COMPARISON_CLASS_P (arg0)
&& operand_equal_for_comparison_p (TREE_OPERAND (arg0, 0), op1)
- && !HONOR_SIGNED_ZEROS (element_mode (op1)))
+ && !HONOR_SIGNED_ZEROS (op1))
{
tem = fold_cond_expr_with_comparison (loc, type, TREE_CODE (arg0),
TREE_OPERAND (arg0, 0),
@@ -12831,7 +12831,7 @@ fold_ternary_loc (location_t loc, enum tree_code code,
tree type,
if (COMPARISON_CLASS_P (arg0)
&& operand_equal_for_comparison_p (TREE_OPERAND (arg0, 0), op2)
- && !HONOR_SIGNED_ZEROS (element_mode (op2)))
+ && !HONOR_SIGNED_ZEROS (op2))
{
enum tree_code comp_code = TREE_CODE (arg0);
tree arg00 = TREE_OPERAND (arg0, 0);
@@ -14713,7 +14713,7 @@ tree_call_nonnegative_warnv_p (tree type, combined_fn
fn, tree arg0, tree arg1,
CASE_CFN_SQRT:
CASE_CFN_SQRT_FN:
/* sqrt(-0.0) is -0.0. */
- if (!HONOR_SIGNED_ZEROS (element_mode (type)))
+ if (!HONOR_SIGNED_ZEROS (type))
return true;
return RECURSE (arg0);
diff --git a/gcc/match.pd b/gcc/match.pd
index 82052714e1c..4e10d54383c 100644
--- a/gcc/match.pd
+++ b/gcc/match.pd
@@ -1458,8 +1458,8 @@ DEFINE_INT_AND_FLOAT_ROUND_FN (RINT)
/* -(A + B) -> (-B) - A. */
(simplify
(negate (plus:c @0 negate_expr_p@1))
- (if (!HONOR_SIGN_DEPENDENT_ROUNDING (element_mode (type))
- && !HONOR_SIGNED_ZEROS (element_mode (type)))
+ (if (!HONOR_SIGN_DEPENDENT_ROUNDING (type)
+ && !HONOR_SIGNED_ZEROS (type))
(minus (negate @1) @0)))
/* -(A - B) -> B - A. */
--
2.27.0
