PING^1

On 6/28/21 2:19 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 6/24/21 12:46 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
Hi!

On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 03:22:34PM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
As mentioned in the "Fallout: save/restore target options in
handle_optimize_attribute"
thread, we need to support target option restore of
rs6000_long_double_type_size == FLOAT_PRECISION_TFmode.

I have no idea?  Could you explain please?

Sure. Few weeks ago, we started using cl_target_option_{save,restore} calls
even for optimize attributes (and pragma). Motivation was that optimize options
can influence target options (and vice versa).

Doing that, FLOAT_PRECISION_TFmode must be accepted as a valid option value
for rs6000_long_double_type_size.


--- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c
+++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c
@@ -4185,6 +4185,8 @@ rs6000_option_override_internal (bool global_init_p)
        else
      rs6000_long_double_type_size = default_long_double_size;
      }
+  else if (rs6000_long_double_type_size == FLOAT_PRECISION_TFmode)
+    ; /* The option can be restored a TREE_TARGET_OPTION.  */

What does that mean?  It is not grammatical, and not obvious what it
should mean.

Updated.


--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pragma-optimize.c
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+/* { dg-do compile { target { powerpc*-*-linux* } } } */

Why on Linux only?  That doesn't sound right.  Do you need some other
selector(s)?

Sorry, I copied the test-case.


+/* { dg-options "-O2 -mlong-double-128 -mabi=ibmlongdouble" } */
+
+extern unsigned long int x;
+extern float f (float);
+extern __typeof (f) f_power8;
+extern __typeof (f) f_power9;
+extern __typeof (f) f __attribute__ ((ifunc ("f_ifunc")));
+static __attribute__ ((optimize ("-fno-stack-protector"))) __typeof (f) *

-fno-stack-protector is default.

Yes, but one needs an optimize attribute in order to trigger 
cl_target_option_save/restore
mechanism.

Martin


+f_ifunc (void)
+{
+  __typeof (f) *res = x ? f_power9 : f_power8;
+  return res;
+}

The testcase should say what it is testing for, it is not obvious?


Segher



Reply via email to