This is the mail system at host fx409.security-mail.net.
I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.
For further assistance, please send mail to postmaster.
If you do so, please include this problem report. You can
delete your own text from the attached returned message.
The mail system
<[email protected]>: host zimbra2.kalray.eu[195.135.97.26] said: 550
5.1.1 <[email protected]>: Recipient address rejected: User unknown
in virtual mailbox table (in reply to RCPT TO command)
Reporting-MTA: dns; fx409.security-mail.net
X-Postfix-Queue-ID: 1E0B63238E5
X-Postfix-Sender: rfc822; [email protected]
Arrival-Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 11:35:17 +0200 (CEST)
Final-Recipient: rfc822; [email protected]
Original-Recipient: rfc822;[email protected]
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.1
Remote-MTA: dns; zimbra2.kalray.eu
Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550 5.1.1 <[email protected]>: Recipient address
rejected: User unknown in virtual mailbox table
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) by
fx409.security-mail.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3866323659 for
<[email protected]>; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 11:35:12 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by
sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6F2B385701D for
<[email protected]>; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 09:35:11 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com
(us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by sourceware.org
(Postfix) with ESMTP id BE86B385780A for <[email protected]>; Tue, 10
Aug 2021 09:34:14 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com
[209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id
us-mta-267-G_Xo3-M5MmuNjX1L_mR37w-1; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 05:34:13 -0400
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com
(int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with
cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by
mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30713801AE7 for
<[email protected]>; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 09:34:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (unknown [10.39.193.120]) by
smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8696A60854 for
<[email protected]>; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 09:34:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tucnak.zalov.cz
(8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPS id 17A9Y4Cp1033420 (version=TLSv1.3
cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for
<[email protected]>; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 11:34:05 +0200
Received: (from jakub@localhost) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.16.1/8.16.1/Submit)
id 17A9Y3qn1033419 for [email protected]; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 11:34:03
+0200
X-Quarantine-ID: <pfTQHK5BmCDY>
X-Virus-Scanned: E-securemail, by Secumail
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.379 tagged_above=-1000 required=7.5
tests=[AB_ENVFROM_LONG_40=0.5, AB_LONG_SUBJ_30=0.001,
DCC_REPUT_00_12=-0.002, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
FSL_HTML_ENT_LOTS_1=0.01, FSL_HTML_ENT_LOTS_2=0.01,
FSL_HTML_ENT_LOTS_3=0.01, FSL_RCVD_EX_GT_5=1, FSL_RCVD_UT_GT_5=0.01,
HEAD_NEWS=-0.5, MISSING_MID=0.14, MM_ENVFROM_BOUNCE=1,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-1.3, S_FROM_GREY_MINUS_2=-2, S_KW_BODY_EXPLICIT_=2.5]
autolearn=disabled
Authentication-Results: fx409.security-mail.net (amavisd-new); dkim=pass
(1024-bit key) header.d=gcc.gnu.org
Secumail-id: <b909.61124850.b636c.0>
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B6F2B385701D
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
s=default; t=1628588111; bh=tzbRKtW8BXS1CQn+wgSaigrquTg45e3ecyRzvcn0FYM=;
h=Date:To:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:
List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:From;
b=m1IYcNVEW2hG3e/52ghShfxcz32xe1EBeH51vhGVSmVQj4FFtojpazNk4IUqhRSLD
nW6UrLkcpZZjrmYPchWodiMWd+lK4HUY9PvNo3BGysN58F34INWcMZ1frxjwZbwLjY
2dXwkFAgNHQgkbGIA7dEnGyYM+bo5gLajhliRa6A=
X-Original-To: [email protected]
Delivered-To: [email protected]
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org BE86B385780A
X-MC-Unique: G_Xo3-M5MmuNjX1L_mR37w-1
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 11:34:03 +0200
To: [email protected]
Subject: [committed] openmp: Add support for declare simd and declare
variant in a attribute syntax
Message-ID: <20210810093403.GK2380545@tucnak>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.13
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0
X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com
X-BeenThere: [email protected]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-patches>,
<mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
List-Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-patches>,
<mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
From: Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches <[email protected]>
Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek <[email protected]>
Errors-To: [email protected]
Sender: Gcc-patches
<[email protected]>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_WhqiTbHUGhAxDAymDSJ7Aev"
X-ALTERMIMEV2_in: done
