On 9/2/21 11:37 PM, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
On 9/2/21 10:18 PM, sunil.k.pandey wrote:
On Linux/x86_64,
93b6b2f614eb692d1d8126ec6cb946984a9d01d7 is the first bad commit
commit 93b6b2f614eb692d1d8126ec6cb946984a9d01d7
Author: Sandra Loosemore <san...@codesourcery.com>
Date: Wed Aug 18 07:22:03 2021 -0700
libgfortran: Further fixes for GFC/CFI descriptor conversions.
caused
FAIL: gfortran.dg/PR100914.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/PR100914.f90 -O1 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/PR100914.f90 -O2 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/PR100914.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
-funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions (test for
excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/PR100914.f90 -O3 -g (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/PR100914.f90 -Os (test for excess errors)
I did not see this failure in my own testing, but I also had this patch
for another known bug in my stack:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-August/056382.html
I just pinged that earlier this evening as it has not been reviewed yet.
I'll rebuild/retest without that patch and confirm that's what the
problem is.
I'm still not seeing these FAILs in my test results. Can you provide
any details about the "excess errors" it is producing? E.g. is it the
same missing libquadmath.h error reported here?
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-September/056467.html
-Sandra
