On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 03:56:42PM +0800, Hongtao Liu wrote:
> > Wouldn't it be better to do:
> >           E_VOIDmode:
> >             gcc_assert (convert_p);
> !convert_p, Must be typo :)

Yes, sorry.
> 
> >             break;
> >           default:
> >             gcc_unreachable ();
> > ?
> Sure.

        Jakub

Reply via email to