On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 03:56:42PM +0800, Hongtao Liu wrote: > > Wouldn't it be better to do: > > E_VOIDmode: > > gcc_assert (convert_p); > !convert_p, Must be typo :)
Yes, sorry. > > > break; > > default: > > gcc_unreachable (); > > ? > Sure. Jakub
Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches Sat, 18 Sep 2021 00:57:44 -0700
On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 03:56:42PM +0800, Hongtao Liu wrote: > > Wouldn't it be better to do: > > E_VOIDmode: > > gcc_assert (convert_p); > !convert_p, Must be typo :)
Yes, sorry. > > > break; > > default: > > gcc_unreachable (); > > ? > Sure. Jakub