RE: [PATCH 06/13] arm: Fix mve_vmvnq_n_ argument mode

[Kyrylo Tkachov via Gcc-patches]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gcc-patches <gcc-patches-
> bounces+kyrylo.tkachov=arm....@gcc.gnu.org> On Behalf Of Christophe
> Lyon via Gcc-patches
> Sent: 07 September 2021 10:17
> To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: [PATCH 06/13] arm: Fix mve_vmvnq_n_<supf><mode> argument
> mode
> 
> The vmvnq_n* intrinsics and have [u]int[16|32]_t arguments, so use
> <V_elem> iterator instead of HI in mve_vmvnq_n_<supf><mode>.

Ok. This can go in independently from the rest if testing is ok.
Thanks,
Kyrill

> 
> 2021-09-03  Christophe Lyon  <christophe.l...@foss.st.com>
> 
>       gcc/
>       * config/arm/mve.md (mve_vmvnq_n_<supf><mode>): Use V_elem
> mode
>       for operand 1.
> 
> diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/mve.md b/gcc/config/arm/mve.md
> index e393518ea88..14d17060290 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/arm/mve.md
> +++ b/gcc/config/arm/mve.md
> @@ -617,7 +617,7 @@ (define_insn "mve_vcvtaq_<supf><mode>"
>  (define_insn "mve_vmvnq_n_<supf><mode>"
>    [
>     (set (match_operand:MVE_5 0 "s_register_operand" "=w")
> -     (unspec:MVE_5 [(match_operand:HI 1 "immediate_operand" "i")]
> +     (unspec:MVE_5 [(match_operand:<V_elem> 1
> "immediate_operand" "i")]
>        VMVNQ_N))
>    ]
>    "TARGET_HAVE_MVE"
> --
> 2.25.1