On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 05:09:05PM -0000, Greta Yorsh wrote: > Is it OK for GCC 4.7 Stage 4 ?
Technically this is a regression in 4.7 compared to 4.6, so I'd like to get this in. However given the stage we are and given that it's not a correctness issue, I would defer to the RMs. In any case there are a couple of changes that I'd like done as explained below. > [(parallel > [(set (match_dup 4) (match_op_dup 5 [(match_dup 6) (match_dup 7)])) > (clobber (reg:CC CC_REGNUM))])] > @@ -1180,9 +1181,10 @@ > (match_operator:SI 5 "commutative_binary_operator" > [(match_operand:SI 6 "s_register_operand" "") > (match_operand:SI 7 "s_register_operand" "")]))] > - "(((operands[6] == operands[0] && operands[7] == operands[1]) > - || (operands[7] == operands[0] && operands[6] == operands[1])) > - && peep2_reg_dead_p (3, operands[0]) && peep2_reg_dead_p (3, > operands[1]))" > + "(((rtx_equal_p (operands[6], operands[0]) && rtx_equal_p (operands[7], > operands[1])) > + || (rtx_equal_p (operands[7], operands[0]) && rtx_equal_p (operands[6], > operands[1]))) Likewise. regards Ramana
