On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 2:17 AM HAO CHEN GUI <guih...@linux.ibm.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > The patch optimizes the code generation for vec_xl_sext builtin. Now all > the sign extensions are done on VSX registers directly. > > Bootstrapped and tested on powerpc64le-linux with no regressions. Is this > okay for trunk? Any recommendations? Thanks a lot. > > I refined the patch according to Bill and David's advice. I put the > patch.diff and ChangeLog in attachment also in case the indentation doesn't > show correctly in email body. > > > ChangeLog > > 2021-10-11 Haochen Gui <guih...@linux.ibm.com> > > > gcc/ > > * config/rs6000/rs6000-call.c (altivec_expand_lxvr_builtin): > > Modify the expansion for sign extension. All extensions are done > > within VSX registers. > > > gcc/testsuite/ > > * gcc.target/powerpc/p10_vec_xl_sext.c: New test.
This is okay. Thanks, David
