On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 11:04 PM Kewen.Lin <li...@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> As PR102767 shows, the commit r12-3482 exposed one ICE in function
> rs6000_builtin_vectorization_cost. We claims V1TI supports movmisalign
> on rs6000 (See define_expand "movmisalign<mode>"), so it return true in
> rs6000_builtin_support_vector_misalignment for misalign 8. Later in
> the cost querying rs6000_builtin_vectorization_cost, we don't have
> the arms to handle the V1TI input under (TARGET_VSX &&
> TARGET_ALLOW_MOVMISALIGN).
>
> The proposed fix is to add the consideration for V1TI, simply make it
> as the cost for doubleword which is apparently bigger than the cost of
> scalar, won't have the vectorization to happen, just to keep consistency
> and avoid ICE. Another thought is to not support movmisalign for V1TI,
> but it sounds like a bad idea since it doesn't match the reality.
>
> Bootstrapped and regtested on powerpc64le-linux-gnu P9 and
> powerpc64-linux-gnu P8.
>
> Is it ok for trunk?
>
> BR,
> Kewen
> -----
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> PR target/102767
> * config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_builtin_vectorization_cost): Consider
> V1T1 mode for unaligned load and store.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> PR target/102767
> * gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-fortran/pr102767.f90: New file.
>
> diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c
> index b7ea1483da5..73d3e06c3fc 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c
> +++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c
> @@ -5145,7 +5145,8 @@ rs6000_builtin_vectorization_cost (enum
> vect_cost_for_stmt type_of_cost,
> if (TARGET_VSX && TARGET_ALLOW_MOVMISALIGN)
> {
> elements = TYPE_VECTOR_SUBPARTS (vectype);
> - if (elements == 2)
> + /* See PR102767, consider V1TI to keep consistency. */
> + if (elements == 2 || elements == 1)
> /* Double word aligned. */
> return 4;
>
> @@ -5184,10 +5185,11 @@ rs6000_builtin_vectorization_cost (enum
> vect_cost_for_stmt type_of_cost,
>
> if (TARGET_VSX && TARGET_ALLOW_MOVMISALIGN)
> {
> - elements = TYPE_VECTOR_SUBPARTS (vectype);
> - if (elements == 2)
> - /* Double word aligned. */
> - return 2;
> + elements = TYPE_VECTOR_SUBPARTS (vectype);
> + /* See PR102767, consider V1TI to keep consistency. */
> + if (elements == 2 || elements == 1)
> + /* Double word aligned. */
> + return 2;
This section of the patch incorrectly changes the indentation. Please
use the correct indentation.
>
> if (elements == 4)
> {
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-fortran/pr102767.f90
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-fortran/pr102767.f90
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..a4122482989
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-fortran/pr102767.f90
> @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
> +! { dg-require-effective-target powerpc_vsx_ok }
> +! { dg-options "-mvsx -O2 -ftree-vectorize -mno-efficient-unaligned-vsx" }
> +
> +INTERFACE
> + FUNCTION elemental_mult (a, b, c)
> + type(*), DIMENSION(..) :: a, b, c
> + END
> +END INTERFACE
> +
> +allocatable z
> +integer, dimension(2,2) :: a, b
> +call test_CFI_address
> +contains
> + subroutine test_CFI_address
> + if (elemental_mult (z, x, y) .ne. 0) stop
> + a = reshape ([4,3,2,1], [2,2])
> + b = reshape ([2,3,4,5], [2,2])
> + if (elemental_mult (i, a, b) .ne. 0) stop
> + end
> +end
> +
>
The patch is okay with the indentation correction.
Thanks, David
