On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 12:49 PM H.J. Lu via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > > PR target/98667 > * doc/invoke.texi: Document -fcf-protection requires i686 or > new. > --- > gcc/doc/invoke.texi | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi > index c66a25fcd69..71992b8c597 100644 > --- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi > +++ b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi > @@ -15542,7 +15542,8 @@ which functions and calls should be skipped from > instrumentation > (@pxref{Function Attributes}). > > Currently the x86 GNU/Linux target provides an implementation based > -on Intel Control-flow Enforcement Technology (CET). > +on Intel Control-flow Enforcement Technology (CET) which works for > +i686 processor or newer.
I think "processor" should be pluralized to "processors"? Also, possibly a missing comma after "(CET)"? > > @item -fstack-protector > @opindex fstack-protector > -- > 2.32.0 >