On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 07:29:03AM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
> Check optab before transforming equivalent, but slighly different cases
> to their canonical forms in optimize_atomic_bit_test_and and require
> TARGET_HIMODE_MATH in HImode atomic bit expanders.
> 
> gcc/
> 
>       PR target/103205
>       * tree-ssa-ccp.c (optimize_atomic_bit_test_and): Check optab
>       before transforming equivalent, but slighly different cases to
>       their canonical forms.
>       * config/i386/sync.md (atomic_bit_test_and_set<mode>): Require
>       TARGET_HIMODE_MATH for HImode.
>       (atomic_bit_test_and_complement<mode>): Likewise.
>       (atomic_bit_test_and_reset<mode>): Likewise.
> 
> gcc/testsuite/
> 
>       PR target/103205
>       * gcc.target/i386/pr103205-1a.c: New test.
>       * gcc.target/i386/pr103205-1b.c: Likewise.
>       * gcc.target/i386/pr103205-2a.c: Likewise.
>       * gcc.target/i386/pr103205-2b.c: Likewise.
>       * gcc.target/i386/pr103205-3.c: Likewise.
>       * gcc.target/i386/pr103205-4.c: Likewise.

Why?  When one uses 16-bit atomics, no matter what he does there will be
some HImode math (at least the atomic instruction).  And the rest can be
dealt with.

I have following patch queued for testing for this...

2021-11-12  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>

        PR target/103205
        * config/i386/sync.md (atomic_bit_test_and_set<mode>,
        atomic_bit_test_and_complement<mode>,
        atomic_bit_test_and_reset<mode>): Use OPTAB_WIDEN instead of
        OPTAB_DIRECT.

        * gcc.target/i386/pr103205.c: New test.

--- gcc/config/i386/sync.md.jj  2021-10-04 19:53:01.025005548 +0200
+++ gcc/config/i386/sync.md     2021-11-12 15:27:47.387273428 +0100
@@ -726,7 +726,7 @@ (define_expand "atomic_bit_test_and_set<
   rtx result = convert_modes (<MODE>mode, QImode, tem, 1);
   if (operands[4] == const0_rtx)
     result = expand_simple_binop (<MODE>mode, ASHIFT, result,
-                                 operands[2], operands[0], 0, OPTAB_DIRECT);
+                                 operands[2], operands[0], 0, OPTAB_WIDEN);
   if (result != operands[0])
     emit_move_insn (operands[0], result);
   DONE;
@@ -763,7 +763,7 @@ (define_expand "atomic_bit_test_and_comp
   rtx result = convert_modes (<MODE>mode, QImode, tem, 1);
   if (operands[4] == const0_rtx)
     result = expand_simple_binop (<MODE>mode, ASHIFT, result,
-                                 operands[2], operands[0], 0, OPTAB_DIRECT);
+                                 operands[2], operands[0], 0, OPTAB_WIDEN);
   if (result != operands[0])
     emit_move_insn (operands[0], result);
   DONE;
@@ -801,7 +801,7 @@ (define_expand "atomic_bit_test_and_rese
   rtx result = convert_modes (<MODE>mode, QImode, tem, 1);
   if (operands[4] == const0_rtx)
     result = expand_simple_binop (<MODE>mode, ASHIFT, result,
-                                 operands[2], operands[0], 0, OPTAB_DIRECT);
+                                 operands[2], operands[0], 0, OPTAB_WIDEN);
   if (result != operands[0])
     emit_move_insn (operands[0], result);
   DONE;
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr103205.c.jj 2021-11-12 15:47:21.218380790 
+0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr103205.c    2021-11-12 15:46:39.546980182 
+0100
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+/* PR target/103205 */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -mtune-ctrl=^himode_math" } */
+
+unsigned short a;
+
+unsigned short
+foo (void)
+{
+  return __sync_fetch_and_and (&a, ~1) & 1;
+}


        Jakub

Reply via email to