Hi! This patch is broken out from the test suite patch for the new
builtins support. This one is just a minor adjustment for the error
message wording.
Tested on powerpc64le-linux-gnu and powerpc64-linux-gnu (-m32/-m64)
with no regressions. Is this okay for trunk?
Thanks!
Bill
2021-11-17 Bill Schmidt <wschm...@linux.ibm.com>
gcc/testsuite/
* gcc.target/powerpc/pragma_misc9.c: Adjust error message.
---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pragma_misc9.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pragma_misc9.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pragma_misc9.c
index e03099bd084..c1667d9f7db 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pragma_misc9.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pragma_misc9.c
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ vector bool int
test2 (vector signed int a, vector signed int b)
{
return vec_cmpnez (a, b);
- /* { dg-error "'__builtin_altivec_vcmpnezw' requires the '-mcpu=power9'
option" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 } */
+ /* { dg-error "'__builtin_altivec_vcmpnezw' requires the '-mcpu=power9' and
'-mvsx' options" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 } */
}
#pragma GCC target ("cpu=power7")
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ vector signed int
test3 (vector signed int a, vector signed int b)
{
return vec_mergee (a, b);
- /* { dg-error "'__builtin_altivec_vmrgew_v4si' requires the
'-mpower8-vector' option" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 } */
+ /* { dg-error "'__builtin_altivec_vmrgew_v4si' requires the '-mcpu=power8'
and '-mvsx' options" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 } */
}
#pragma GCC target ("cpu=power6")
--
2.27.0
