Hi.

This is a refactoring I noticed.

Patch can bootstrap on x86_64-linux-gnu and survives regression tests.

Ready to be installed?
Thanks,
Martin

gcc/ChangeLog:

        * ipa-modref.c (analyze_function): Use fnode instead of repeated
        cgraph_node::get (current_function_decl).
---
 gcc/ipa-modref.c | 26 ++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/ipa-modref.c b/gcc/ipa-modref.c
index c94f0589d44..a3c7c6d6a1f 100644
--- a/gcc/ipa-modref.c
+++ b/gcc/ipa-modref.c
@@ -2870,22 +2870,22 @@ analyze_function (function *f, bool ipa)
        {
          if (dump_file
              && (summary
-                 = optimization_summaries->get (cgraph_node::get (f->decl)))
+                 = optimization_summaries->get (fnode))
                 != NULL
              && summary->loads)
            {
              fprintf (dump_file, "Past summary:\n");
              optimization_summaries->get
-                (cgraph_node::get (f->decl))->dump (dump_file);
+                (fnode)->dump (dump_file);
              past_flags.reserve_exact (summary->arg_flags.length ());
              past_flags.splice (summary->arg_flags);
              past_retslot_flags = summary->retslot_flags;
              past_static_chain_flags = summary->static_chain_flags;
              past_flags_known = true;
            }
-         optimization_summaries->remove (cgraph_node::get (f->decl));
+         optimization_summaries->remove (fnode);
        }
-      summary = optimization_summaries->get_create (cgraph_node::get 
(f->decl));
+      summary = optimization_summaries->get_create (fnode);
       gcc_checking_assert (nolto && !lto);
     }
   /* In IPA mode we analyze every function precisely once.  Assert that.  */
@@ -2896,16 +2896,16 @@ analyze_function (function *f, bool ipa)
          if (!summaries)
            summaries = modref_summaries::create_ggc (symtab);
          else
-           summaries->remove (cgraph_node::get (f->decl));
-         summary = summaries->get_create (cgraph_node::get (f->decl));
+           summaries->remove (fnode);
+         summary = summaries->get_create (fnode);
        }
       if (lto)
        {
          if (!summaries_lto)
            summaries_lto = modref_summaries_lto::create_ggc (symtab);
          else
-           summaries_lto->remove (cgraph_node::get (f->decl));
-         summary_lto = summaries_lto->get_create (cgraph_node::get (f->decl));
+           summaries_lto->remove (fnode);
+         summary_lto = summaries_lto->get_create (fnode);
        }
       if (!fnspec_summaries)
        fnspec_summaries = new fnspec_summaries_t (symtab);
@@ -3024,13 +3024,11 @@ analyze_function (function *f, bool ipa)
        {
          if (!summary->loads->every_base && !summary->loads->bases
              && !summary->calls_interposable)
-           fixup_cfg = ipa_make_function_const
-                  (cgraph_node::get (current_function_decl),
-                   summary->side_effects, true);
+           fixup_cfg = ipa_make_function_const (fnode,
+                                                summary->side_effects, true);
          else
-           fixup_cfg = ipa_make_function_pure
-                  (cgraph_node::get (current_function_decl),
-                   summary->side_effects, true);
+           fixup_cfg = ipa_make_function_pure (fnode,
+                                               summary->side_effects, true);
        }
     }
   if (summary && !summary->useful_p (ecf_flags))
--
2.33.1

Reply via email to