On 11/24/21 8:21 AM, Richard Biener via Gcc-patches wrote:
This resurrects -Wunreachable-code and implements a warning for
trivially unreachable code as of CFG construction.  Most problematic
with this is the C/C++ frontend added 'return 0;' stmt in main
which the patch handles for C++ like the C frontend already does
by using BUILTINS_LOCATION.

Another problem for future enhancement is that after CFG construction
we no longer can point to the stmt making a stmt unreachable, so
this implementation tries to warn on the first unreachable
statement of a region.  It might be possible to retain a pointer
to the stmt that triggered creation of a basic-block but I'm not
sure how reliable that would be.

So this is really a simple attempt for now, triggered by myself
running into such a coding error.  As always, the perfect is the
enemy of the good.

It does not pass bootstrap (which enables -Wextra), because of the
situation in g++.dg/Wunreachable-code-5.C where the C++ frontend
prematurely elides conditions like if (! GATHER_STATISTICS) that
evaluate to true - oddly enough it does _not_ do this for
conditions evaluating to false ... (one of the
c-c++-common/Wunreachable-code-2.c cases).

I'm very much in favor of reviving the warning, even in its
current simplistic form.  I especially welcome the suggestion
to enhance it in the future, including adjusting its schedule
among other passes (or adding other, later invocations).  It
would be overly constraining to consider this placement ideal
or set in stone.

Among possible enhancements worth considering is handling
constant conditionals like:

int f (void)
{
  if (1)
    return 0;
  else
    return 1;   <<< warn
}

int g (void)
{
  if (1)
    return 0;
  return 1;     <<< warn also in C (not just in C++)
}

By the way, a related feature that would be useful and that's
been requested in the past is warning for stores with no effect,
as in:

  int i;
  i = 1;
  i = 2;   <<< warn here

The detection of the simple cases like the one above can also
be almost trivially implemented.

Martin


Richard.

2021-11-24  Richard Biener  <rguent...@suse.de>

        PR middle-end/46476
        * common.opt (Wunreachable-code): No longer ignored,
        add warn_unreachable_code variable, enable with -Wextra.
        * doc/invoke.texi (Wunreachable-code): Document.
        (Wextra): Amend.
        * tree-cfg.c (build_gimple_cfg): Move case label grouping...
        (execute_build_cfg): ... here after new -Wunreachable-code
        warnings.
        (warn_unreachable_code_post_cfg_build): New function.
        (mark_forward_reachable_blocks): Likewise.
        (reverse_guess_deadend): Likewise.

gcc/cp/
        * decl.c (finish_function): Set input_location to
        BUILTINS_LOCATION around the code building the return 0
        for main().

libgomp/
        * oacc-plugin.c (GOMP_PLUGIN_acc_default_dim): Remove spurious
        return.

gcc/testsuite/
        * c-c++-common/Wunreachable-code-1.c: New testcase.
        * c-c++-common/Wunreachable-code-2.c: Likewise.
        * c-c++-common/Wunreachable-code-3.c: Likewise.
        * gcc.dg/Wunreachable-code-4.c: Likewise.
        * g++.dg/Wunreachable-code-5.C: Likewise.
---
  gcc/common.opt                                |   4 +-
  gcc/cp/decl.c                                 |   9 +-
  gcc/doc/invoke.texi                           |   9 +-
  .../c-c++-common/Wunreachable-code-1.c        |   8 ++
  .../c-c++-common/Wunreachable-code-2.c        |   8 ++
  .../c-c++-common/Wunreachable-code-3.c        |  35 ++++++
  gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/Wunreachable-code-5.C    |  11 ++
  gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/Wunreachable-code-4.c    |  10 ++
  gcc/tree-cfg.c                                | 101 +++++++++++++++++-
  libgomp/oacc-plugin.c                         |   1 -
  10 files changed, 186 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Wunreachable-code-1.c
  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Wunreachable-code-2.c
  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Wunreachable-code-3.c
  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/Wunreachable-code-5.C
  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/Wunreachable-code-4.c

diff --git a/gcc/common.opt b/gcc/common.opt
index 755e1a233b7..0a58cb8a668 100644
--- a/gcc/common.opt
+++ b/gcc/common.opt
@@ -806,8 +806,8 @@ Common Var(warn_maybe_uninitialized) Warning 
EnabledBy(Wuninitialized)
  Warn about maybe uninitialized automatic variables.
Wunreachable-code
-Common Ignore Warning
-Does nothing. Preserved for backward compatibility.
+Common Var(warn_unreachable_code) Warning EnabledBy(Wextra)
+Warn about trivially unreachable code.
Wunused
  Common Var(warn_unused) Init(0) Warning
diff --git a/gcc/cp/decl.c b/gcc/cp/decl.c
index 588094b1db6..26325e41efa 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/decl.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/decl.c
@@ -17571,7 +17571,14 @@ finish_function (bool inline_p)
      {
        /* Make it so that `main' always returns 0 by default.  */
        if (DECL_MAIN_P (current_function_decl))
-       finish_return_stmt (integer_zero_node);
+       {
+         /* Hack.  We don't want the middle-end to warn that this return
+            is unreachable, so we mark its location as special.  */
+         auto saved_il = input_location;
+         input_location = BUILTINS_LOCATION;
+         finish_return_stmt (integer_zero_node);
+         input_location = saved_il;
+       }
if (use_eh_spec_block (current_function_decl))
        finish_eh_spec_block (TYPE_RAISES_EXCEPTIONS
diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
index 36fe96b441b..62643e51915 100644
--- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
@@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ in the following sections.
  -Woverloaded-virtual  -Wno-pmf-conversions -Wsign-promo @gol
  -Wsized-deallocation  -Wsuggest-final-methods @gol
  -Wsuggest-final-types  -Wsuggest-override  @gol
--Wno-terminate  -Wuseless-cast  -Wno-vexing-parse  @gol
+-Wno-terminate  -Wunreachable-code  -Wuseless-cast  -Wno-vexing-parse  @gol
  -Wvirtual-inheritance  @gol
  -Wno-virtual-move-assign  -Wvolatile  -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant}
@@ -4357,6 +4357,12 @@ annotations.
  Warn about overriding virtual functions that are not marked with the
  @code{override} keyword.
+@item -Wunreachable-code
+@opindex Wunreachable-code
+@opindex Wno-unreachable-code
+Warn about code that is trivially unreachable before optimizing.
+@option{-Wunreachable-code} is enabled by @option{-Wextra}.
+
  @item -Wuseless-cast @r{(C++ and Objective-C++ only)}
  @opindex Wuseless-cast
  @opindex Wno-useless-cast
@@ -5713,6 +5719,7 @@ name is still supported, but the newer name is more 
descriptive.)
  -Wredundant-move @r{(only for C++)}  @gol
  -Wtype-limits  @gol
  -Wuninitialized  @gol
+-Wunreachable-code @gol
  -Wshift-negative-value @r{(in C++03 and in C99 and newer)}  @gol
  -Wunused-parameter @r{(only with} @option{-Wunused} @r{or} 
@option{-Wall}@r{)} @gol
  -Wunused-but-set-parameter @r{(only with} @option{-Wunused} @r{or} 
@option{-Wall}@r{)}}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Wunreachable-code-1.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Wunreachable-code-1.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..0ca6c00e7fb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Wunreachable-code-1.c
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-Wunreachable-code" } */
+
+int main()
+{
+  /* Avoid warning on the auto-added duplicate return 0. */
+  return 0;
+}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Wunreachable-code-2.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Wunreachable-code-2.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..836d8c30cb2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Wunreachable-code-2.c
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-Wunreachable-code" } */
+
+int main()
+{
+  return 0;
+  return 0; /* { dg-warning "not reachable" } */
+}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Wunreachable-code-3.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Wunreachable-code-3.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..a01e4119c6f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Wunreachable-code-3.c
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-Wunreachable-code" } */
+
+/* Unreachable region entry has a predecessor (backedge).  */
+void foo()
+{
+  return;
+  for (int i = 0; i < 5; ++i) /* { dg-warning "not reachable" } */
+    ;
+}
+
+/* Unreachable region not backwards reachable from exit.  */
+void bar1()
+{
+  return;
+  __builtin_abort (); /* { dg-warning "not reachable" } */
+}
+void bar2()
+{
+  return;
+  /* Here we end up with a BB without any statements and an edge
+     to itself.  A location might be obtainable from the edges
+     goto_locus.  */
+  for (;;); /* { dg-warning "not reachable" "" { xfail *-*-* } } */
+}
+
+/* Unreachable code in if (0) block.  */
+void baz(int *p)
+{
+   if (0)
+     {
+        return;  /* { dg-bogus "not reachable" } */
+        *p = 0;  /* { dg-warning "not reachable" } */
+     }
+}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/Wunreachable-code-5.C 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/Wunreachable-code-5.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..832cb6d865f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/Wunreachable-code-5.C
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-Wunreachable-code" } */
+
+void baz();
+void bar2()
+{
+   if (! 0)
+     return;
+   /* The C++ frontend elides the if above.  */
+   baz (); /* { dg-bogus "not reachable" "" { xfail *-*-* } } */
+}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/Wunreachable-code-4.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/Wunreachable-code-4.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..997ec08fb41
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/Wunreachable-code-4.c
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-Wunreachable-code" } */
+
+void baz();
+void bar2()
+{
+   if (! 0)
+     return;
+   baz (); /* { dg-bogus "not reachable" } */
+}
diff --git a/gcc/tree-cfg.c b/gcc/tree-cfg.c
index 8ed8c69b5b1..5a9507d0e44 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-cfg.c
+++ b/gcc/tree-cfg.c
@@ -239,11 +239,6 @@ build_gimple_cfg (gimple_seq seq)
    /* To speed up statement iterator walks, we first purge dead labels.  */
    cleanup_dead_labels ();
- /* Group case nodes to reduce the number of edges.
-     We do this after cleaning up dead labels because otherwise we miss
-     a lot of obvious case merging opportunities.  */
-  group_case_labels ();
-
    /* Create the edges of the flowgraph.  */
    discriminator_per_locus = new hash_table<locus_discrim_hasher> (13);
    make_edges ();
@@ -362,6 +357,94 @@ replace_loop_annotate (void)
      }
  }
+/* Mark BB and blocks forward reachable from it as BB_REACHABLE. */
+
+static void
+mark_forward_reachable_blocks (basic_block bb)
+{
+  bb->flags |= BB_REACHABLE;
+  edge_iterator ei;
+  edge e;
+  FOR_EACH_EDGE (e, ei, bb->succs)
+    if (!(e->dest->flags & BB_REACHABLE))
+      mark_forward_reachable_blocks (e->dest);
+}
+
+/* Guess a reverse dead end from BB.  */
+
+static basic_block
+reverse_guess_deadend (basic_block bb)
+{
+  /* Quick and simple minded.  */
+  if (EDGE_COUNT (bb->preds) == 0)
+    return bb;
+
+  /* DFS walk.  */
+  auto_bb_flag visited (cfun);
+  auto_bb_flag on_worklist (cfun);
+  auto_vec<basic_block, 64> bbs_to_cleanup;
+  auto_vec<basic_block, 64> worklist;
+  worklist.quick_push (bb);
+  bb->flags |= on_worklist;
+  bbs_to_cleanup.safe_push (bb);
+  while (!worklist.is_empty ())
+    {
+      bb = worklist.pop ();
+      bb->flags &= ~on_worklist;
+      bb->flags |= visited;
+      bool all_preds_visited = true;
+      edge_iterator ei;
+      edge e;
+      FOR_EACH_EDGE (e, ei, bb->preds)
+       if (!(e->src->flags & visited))
+         {
+           if (!(e->src->flags & on_worklist))
+             {
+               worklist.safe_push (e->src);
+               e->src->flags |= on_worklist;
+               bbs_to_cleanup.safe_push (e->src);
+             }
+           all_preds_visited = false;
+         }
+      /* Found one deadend.  */
+      if (all_preds_visited)
+       break;
+    }
+  for (auto bb2 : bbs_to_cleanup)
+    bb2->flags &= ~(on_worklist|visited);
+  return bb;
+}
+
+/* Warn about trivially unreachable code.  */
+
+static void
+warn_unreachable_code_post_cfg_build (void)
+{
+  find_unreachable_blocks ();
+  basic_block bb;
+  FOR_EACH_BB_FN (bb, cfun)
+    {
+      if ((bb->flags & BB_REACHABLE))
+       continue;
+      /* Try to find the entry to the unreachable region.  */
+      bb = reverse_guess_deadend (bb);
+      for (gimple_stmt_iterator gsi = gsi_start_bb (bb); !gsi_end_p (gsi);
+          gsi_next (&gsi))
+       {
+         /* Suppress warnings on BUILTINS_LOCATION which is used by the
+            C and C++ frontends to emit the artifical return in main.  */
+         if (LOCATION_LOCUS (gimple_location (gsi_stmt (gsi)))
+             > BUILTINS_LOCATION)
+           warning_at (gimple_location (gsi_stmt (gsi)),
+                       OPT_Wunreachable_code, "statement is not reachable");
+         break;
+       }
+      /* Mark blocks reachable from here.  And even better make
+        sure to process entries to unreachable regions first.  */
+      mark_forward_reachable_blocks (bb);
+    }
+}
+
  static unsigned int
  execute_build_cfg (void)
  {
@@ -374,6 +457,14 @@ execute_build_cfg (void)
        fprintf (dump_file, "Scope blocks:\n");
        dump_scope_blocks (dump_file, dump_flags);
      }
+
+  if (warn_unreachable_code)
+    warn_unreachable_code_post_cfg_build ();
+
+  /* Group case nodes.  We did this prior to materializing edges in
+     build_gimple_cfg to reduce the number of edges, that interferes
+     with the -Wunreachable-code diagnostics above.  */
+  group_case_labels ();
    cleanup_tree_cfg ();
bb_to_omp_idx.release ();
diff --git a/libgomp/oacc-plugin.c b/libgomp/oacc-plugin.c
index e25b462eff0..98166fe5cd1 100644
--- a/libgomp/oacc-plugin.c
+++ b/libgomp/oacc-plugin.c
@@ -62,7 +62,6 @@ GOMP_PLUGIN_acc_default_dim (unsigned int i)
    if (i >= GOMP_DIM_MAX)
      {
        gomp_fatal ("invalid dimension argument: %d", i);
-      return -1;
      }
    return goacc_default_dims[i];
  }


Reply via email to