On Sun, Nov 28, 2021 at 12:25 PM Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
<gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 11/28/2021 10:56 AM, apinski--- via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > From: Andrew Pinski <apin...@marvell.com>
> >
> > This just adds a simplification to simplify_vector_constructor for
> > vector of 1 element to be VCE which should reduce memory usage in
> > the compiler and maybe allow for some more optimizations.
> >
> > OK? Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux-gnu with no regressions.
> >
> > PR tree-optimization/101540
> >
> > gcc/ChangeLog:
> >
> > * tree-ssa-forwprop.c (simplify_vector_constructor):
> > Simplify constructor of vector of 1 element to just
> > be a VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR.
> >
> > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> >
> > * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr101540-1.c: New test.
> So why generate a VCE here if the type conversion is useless? Why not
> just a NOP_EXPR? Is there something special about converting between
> the element type and the outer vector type that requires VCE rather than
> NOP_EXR? Neither an ACK or NAK, just trying to understand it a bit better.
Because right now tree-cfg.c has this check for vector types for NOP_EXPR:
/* Allow conversions between vectors with the same number of elements,
provided that the conversion is OK for the element types too. */
if (VECTOR_TYPE_P (lhs_type)
&& VECTOR_TYPE_P (rhs1_type)
&& known_eq (TYPE_VECTOR_SUBPARTS (lhs_type),
TYPE_VECTOR_SUBPARTS (rhs1_type)))
{
lhs_type = TREE_TYPE (lhs_type);
rhs1_type = TREE_TYPE (rhs1_type);
}
else if (VECTOR_TYPE_P (lhs_type) || VECTOR_TYPE_P (rhs1_type))
{
error ("invalid vector types in nop conversion");
debug_generic_expr (lhs_type);
debug_generic_expr (rhs1_type);
return true;
}
We can change this check here for NOP_EXPR and vector types but VCE is
still a nop in most cases and handled as such really. But I wonder if
the rest of the compiler is ready for it though.
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
>
> Jeff
>
>
