On Dec 8, 2021, Jeff Law <jeffreya...@gmail.com> wrote: >> expr.c (emit_move_multi_word): Skip clobber during lra.
> OK. I found a similar pattern of issuing clobbers for multi-word moves, but not when reload_in_progress, in expr.c:emit_move_complex_parts. I don't have a testcase, but I'm tempted to propose '!lra_in_progress &&' for it as well. Can you think of any reason not to? I also see lots of uses of reload_in_progress in machine-dependent code, and I suspect many cases involving enabling patterns or checking for legitimate addresses might benefit from the addition of lra_in_progress, but that's too many occurrences to try to make sense of :-( -- Alexandre Oliva, happy hacker https://FSFLA.org/blogs/lxo/ Free Software Activist GNU Toolchain Engineer Disinformation flourishes because many people care deeply about injustice but very few check the facts. Ask me about <https://stallmansupport.org>
