On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 08:00:02AM -0600, Bill Schmidt wrote: > > No, all builtins should work in either mode, and always return long. > > If the patterns are broken, the *patterns* should be fixed :-) > > OK, thanks! This is much clearer now. > > I've opened an internal issue about the deficiencies of the darn patterns and > their associated built-ins. In response to PR103624, I would like to start > with the existing patch to ensure the new support mirrors what we had before, > so we have that as a baseline. We can then move on to fixing the larger > set of problems. Is that a reasonable plan?
It is much more work than doing it correct in the first place. I'll do the RTL side, if you want? Segher
