On 12/16/21 19:32, Joseph Myers wrote:
On Thu, 16 Dec 2021, Martin Liska via Gcc-cvs wrote:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:06cd44b4387a9f6ab46f377f42ee5be9cf11bf15

commit r12-6020-g06cd44b4387a9f6ab46f377f42ee5be9cf11bf15
Author: Matthias Seidel <msei...@apache.org>
Date:   Wed Jun 23 20:35:24 2021 +0200

     Fixed typo
ChangeLog: * config.sub: Fix typo.

I'm not sure where this came from - I don't see it on gcc-patches, either
now or in June - but we shouldn't patch config.sub or config.guess
locally, only update them to the latest version from upstream config.git
without any local changes.  In config.git this change appears with
different attribution as:

Hello.

Oh, sorry, it was me and I forgot to send the patch to the mailing list.
I've basically taken it as: https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/pull/57.

Should I revert the change?
Martin


commit 9428e344e65176b03b69e4bf4ed0d0fc51d4c26f
Author: Kinshuk Dua <kinshuk...@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon Oct 18 15:01:31 2021 +0530

     config.sub: Fix typo in comment
Fixes: 5e531d391852a54e7fab2d8ff55625fca514b305
     Signed-off-by: Dmitry V. Levin <l...@altlinux.org>


Reply via email to