Hi Harald, I’m not on the list for now, please keep me in CC so I don’t miss replies. Thought it feels nice to be working on gfortran again :)
> However, I am wondering if calling the macros safe_* gives a false > impression of what they actually do. The cases where they are used > with your patch applied seem sane, for now, though. I thought about that, it’s not really “safer” than the underlying C library obviously. I couldn’t find a better name, but I’ll wait before I commit so others can suggest something else. unrelated PS: I’ve been thinking aloud and benchmarking faster integer I/O for libgfortran at https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98076 Comments are welcome on the proposed design, I think the current proposal is a low-hanging fruit (not risky, much faster). Best, FX
