Hi!
rs6000-overload.def defines one instance of vec_promote so that it can be
registered with the front end. Actual expansion of the vec_promote overload
is done with special-case code in rs6000-c.c. During another cleanup, I
observed that the fake instance has the wrong number of arguments. Fix that.
This has no effect other than to avoid confusion.
Bootstrapped and tested on powerpc64le-linux-gnu, committed as obvious in
r12-6043.
Thanks!
Bill
diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-overload.def
b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-overload.def
index 531a4fcd1af..2b2853918c0 100644
--- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-overload.def
+++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-overload.def
@@ -3021,7 +3021,7 @@
; is replaced by a constructor. The single overload here causes
; __builtin_vec_promote to be registered with the front end so that can happen.
[VEC_PROMOTE, vec_promote, __builtin_vec_promote]
- vsi __builtin_vec_promote (vsi);
+ vsi __builtin_vec_promote (vsi, const int);
ABS_V4SI PROMOTE_FAKERY
[VEC_RE, vec_re, __builtin_vec_re]
