Updated version of patch following AArch64 review.

Bootstrapped Regtested on arm-none-linux-gnueabihf and no issues.

Ok for master? and backport along with the first patch?

Thanks,
Tamar

gcc/ChangeLog:

        PR tree-optimization/102819
        PR tree-optimization/103169
        * config/arm/vec-common.md (cml<fcmac1><conj_op><mode>4): Use
        canonical order.

--- inline copy of patch ---

diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/vec-common.md b/gcc/config/arm/vec-common.md
index 
e71d9b3811fde62159f5c21944fef9fe3f97b4bd..eab77ac8decce76d70f5b2594f4439e6ed363e6e
 100644
--- a/gcc/config/arm/vec-common.md
+++ b/gcc/config/arm/vec-common.md
@@ -265,18 +265,18 @@ (define_expand "arm_vcmla<rot><mode>"
 ;; remainder.  Because of this, expand early.
 (define_expand "cml<fcmac1><conj_op><mode>4"
   [(set (match_operand:VF 0 "register_operand")
-       (plus:VF (match_operand:VF 1 "register_operand")
-                (unspec:VF [(match_operand:VF 2 "register_operand")
-                            (match_operand:VF 3 "register_operand")]
-                           VCMLA_OP)))]
+       (plus:VF (unspec:VF [(match_operand:VF 1 "register_operand")
+                            (match_operand:VF 2 "register_operand")]
+                           VCMLA_OP)
+                (match_operand:VF 3 "register_operand")))]
   "(TARGET_COMPLEX || (TARGET_HAVE_MVE && TARGET_HAVE_MVE_FLOAT
                      && ARM_HAVE_<MODE>_ARITH)) && !BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN"
 {
   rtx tmp = gen_reg_rtx (<MODE>mode);
-  emit_insn (gen_arm_vcmla<rotsplit1><mode> (tmp, operands[1],
-                                            operands[3], operands[2]));
+  emit_insn (gen_arm_vcmla<rotsplit1><mode> (tmp, operands[3],
+                                            operands[2], operands[1]));
   emit_insn (gen_arm_vcmla<rotsplit2><mode> (operands[0], tmp,
-                                            operands[3], operands[2]));
+                                            operands[2], operands[1]));
   DONE;
 })

Attachment: rb15165.patch
Description: rb15165.patch

Reply via email to