Hi!

My recent commit to tree-vrp.c on the trunk caused the following
testcase to fail, the problem is that we would insert <= 255
assertion for unsigned char expression (which doesn't say anything)
and VRP insist that such ASSERT_EXPRs aren't added.

Fixed thusly, in addition the patch cleans the code slightly,
e.g. by using double_int instead of a pair of uHWIs.

Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux,
ok for trunk?

2012-03-09  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>

        PR tree-optimization/52533
        * tree-vrp.c (register_edge_assert_for_2): Use double_int
        type for mask, only handle shifts by non-zero in-range
        shift count, for LE_EXPR and GT_EXPR if new_val is
        maximum, don't add the assertion.

        * gcc.c-torture/compile/pr52533.c: New test.

--- gcc/tree-vrp.c.jj   2012-03-09 10:26:26.000000000 +0100
+++ gcc/tree-vrp.c      2012-03-09 12:30:19.348501480 +0100
@@ -4470,7 +4470,8 @@ register_edge_assert_for_2 (tree name, e
       gimple def_stmt = SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT (name);
       tree name2 = NULL_TREE, cst2 = NULL_TREE;
       tree val2 = NULL_TREE;
-      unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT mask[2] = { 0, 0 };
+      double_int mask = double_int_zero;
+      unsigned int prec = TYPE_PRECISION (TREE_TYPE (val));
 
       /* Extract CST2 from the right shift.  */
       if (is_gimple_assign (def_stmt)
@@ -4480,23 +4481,13 @@ register_edge_assert_for_2 (tree name, e
          cst2 = gimple_assign_rhs2 (def_stmt);
          if (TREE_CODE (name2) == SSA_NAME
              && host_integerp (cst2, 1)
-             && (unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT) tree_low_cst (cst2, 1)
-                < 2 * HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT
              && INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (name2))
+             && IN_RANGE (tree_low_cst (cst2, 1), 1, prec - 1)
+             && prec <= 2 * HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT
              && live_on_edge (e, name2)
              && !has_single_use (name2))
            {
-             if ((unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT) tree_low_cst (cst2, 1)
-                 < HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT)
-               mask[0] = ((unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT) 1
-                          << tree_low_cst (cst2, 1)) - 1;
-             else
-               {
-                 mask[1] = ((unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT) 1
-                            << (tree_low_cst (cst2, 1)
-                                - HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT)) - 1;
-                 mask[0] = -1;
-               }
+             mask = double_int_mask (tree_low_cst (cst2, 1));
              val2 = fold_binary (LSHIFT_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (val), val, cst2);
            }
        }
@@ -4515,37 +4506,40 @@ register_edge_assert_for_2 (tree name, e
            {
              if (!TYPE_UNSIGNED (TREE_TYPE (val)))
                {
-                 unsigned int prec = TYPE_PRECISION (TREE_TYPE (val));
                  tree type = build_nonstandard_integer_type (prec, 1);
                  tmp = build1 (NOP_EXPR, type, name2);
                  val2 = fold_convert (type, val2);
                }
              tmp = fold_build2 (MINUS_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (tmp), tmp, val2);
-             new_val = build_int_cst_wide (TREE_TYPE (tmp), mask[0], mask[1]);
+             new_val = double_int_to_tree (TREE_TYPE (tmp), mask);
              new_comp_code = comp_code == EQ_EXPR ? LE_EXPR : GT_EXPR;
            }
          else if (comp_code == LT_EXPR || comp_code == GE_EXPR)
            new_val = val2;
          else
            {
-             new_val = build_int_cst_wide (TREE_TYPE (val2),
-                                           mask[0], mask[1]);
-             new_val = fold_binary (BIT_IOR_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (val2),
-                                    val2, new_val);
+             mask = double_int_ior (tree_to_double_int (val2), mask);
+             if (double_int_minus_one_p (double_int_sext (mask, prec)))
+               new_val = NULL_TREE;
+             else
+               new_val = double_int_to_tree (TREE_TYPE (val2), mask);
            }
 
-         if (dump_file)
+         if (new_val)
            {
-             fprintf (dump_file, "Adding assert for ");
-             print_generic_expr (dump_file, name2, 0);
-             fprintf (dump_file, " from ");
-             print_generic_expr (dump_file, tmp, 0);
-             fprintf (dump_file, "\n");
-           }
+             if (dump_file)
+               {
+                 fprintf (dump_file, "Adding assert for ");
+                 print_generic_expr (dump_file, name2, 0);
+                 fprintf (dump_file, " from ");
+                 print_generic_expr (dump_file, tmp, 0);
+                 fprintf (dump_file, "\n");
+               }
 
-         register_new_assert_for (name2, tmp, new_comp_code, new_val,
-                                  NULL, e, bsi);
-         retval = true;
+             register_new_assert_for (name2, tmp, new_comp_code, new_val,
+                                      NULL, e, bsi);
+             retval = true;
+           }
        }
     }
 
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr52533.c.jj    2012-03-09 
12:20:39.189877465 +0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr52533.c       2012-03-09 
09:22:35.000000000 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+/* PR tree-optimization/52533 */
+
+int
+foo (unsigned char x)
+{
+  if (x <= 9)
+    return '0' + x;
+  else if (x <= 15)
+    return 'a' + (x - 10);
+  else
+    return 0;
+}
+
+void
+bar (unsigned char x, unsigned char *y)
+{
+  y[0] = foo ((unsigned char) (x >> 4));
+  y[1] = foo ((unsigned char) (x & 0x0f));
+}

        Jakub

Reply via email to